Sponsored by our friends at Veeam Software! Make sure to click here and get the latest and greatest data protection platform for everything from containers to your cloud!


Sponsored by the Shift Group – Shift Group is turning athletes into sales professionals. Is your company looking to hire driven, competitive former athletes? Shift Group not only offers a large pool of diverse sales candidates from entry level to leadership – they help early stage companies in developing their hiring strategy, interview process and build strong sales cultures that attract the best talent for early stage companies.


Sponsored by the 4-Step Guide to Delivering Extraordinary Software Demos that Win DealsClick here and because we had such good response we have opened it up to make the eBook and Audiobook more accessible by offering it all for only 5$


Sponsored by Diabolical Coffee. Devilishly good coffee and diabolically awesome clothing


Does your startup need strategic technical content? The team at GTM Delta delivers SEO-optimized, compelling content that connects your company with technical users to help grow your credibility, and your pipeline.


Need Podcast gear? We are partnered up with Podcast Gear Pro to share tips, gear ideas and much more. Check it out at PodcastGearPro.com.


Randy is a recognized brand strategist, conceptor, and creative director with over twenty-five years of marketing and innovation experience in the client, agency and media worlds, from entrepreneurial to corporate environments.

We discuss the power and importance of storytelling, the choice of medium (and platform), plus core lessons and fundamentals that every entrepreneur or business needs to embrace to successfully amplify their message and value.

Check out The Visual Brand here: https://www.thevisualbrand.com/ 

Transcript powered by Happy Scribe

Welcome to the show. My name is Eric Wright. I am host for your DiscoPosse Podcast and this is going to be a really, really great story bound episode with the voice, the creator and the minds behind The Visual Brand is Randy Herbertson. He’s a really, really incredible individual. But let’s just wait for a second.

And speaking of stories, I’ve got a story to tell you. It’s a story, making sure that you protect all the data you got because before you get into the podcast, make sure you get yourself over the fine friends and Veeam software.

I’ve got to give a shot out because they’re a huge support of the podcast in the community and really, really seen a lot of neat stuff they’re doing. They’ve got events coming up. But more than anything, do you want to protect your data whether it’s On-premises, whether it’s in the Cloud, whether it’s Cloud-Native. Oh, yeah. You’ve got a back up set up too. Oh and SaaS, back that SaaS up. That’s right. Including Office 365 Microsoft teams. That stuff is just automatically backed up because it’s in the Cloud. In fact, the Cloud is just somebody else’s computer. That’s right. Sorry to break it to you.

But the best way you can fix this is go to Veeam and that is going to vee.am/DiscoPosse and you can find out everything you need. They’ve got a really cool campaign going right now. Head over there. Go do it. Trust me. I love those guys. vee.am/DiscoPosse to find out more.

And speaking of protecting, protect your privacy. How do you do that? Easy. Get ExpressVPN. I use it for a variety of reasons because I travel a bunch and I don’t trust Wi-Fi anywhere.

So if you protect your data in flight, a great way to do it. Go to tryexpressvpn.com/DiscoPosse And that’s the way to do it. Seriously, go do it. Really cool. Absolutely worth it. And speaking of places where you can get your Wi-Fi sniffed, not when you’re using ExpressVPN, of course. But don’t go to your local coffee shop, get your coffee at home. Go to diabolicalcoffee.com and you can get the most devilishly good coffee around here and the most diabolically awesome swag.

That’s right. Go check it out. Go to diabolicalcoffee.com. There you go. End of the sponsors, time for the good stuff.

This is Randy Herbertson. Randy is really cool. I love this chat. He’s just such a he gets it. He gets how to tell stories. So we go through the history of big brands. Oh, you’re gonna love it. Seriously, I’m actually just excited as your about to enjoy this episode as much as I did. So this is it. This is Randy Herbertson from The Visual Brand on the DiscoPosse Podcast.

This is Randy Herbertson. I am the founder and principal of The Visual Brand, and you’re listening to the DiscoPosse Podcast.

My favorite thing I love, especially when people that your job and your passion is brand. And you nailed it on the first try for, first of all, saying DiscoPosse podcast is a challenge unto itself. But as somebody who, when I look at the work you’ve done and your approach to things and I’m really, really excited by the chance to chat today. For folks that are brand new to you, you can definitely give your better version of your backgrounds than I can. So let’s do that. Randy, tell folks about you, The Visual Brand, and this is going to be fun because I know this is an area that I’m passionate about, and a lot of people come to me regularly.

Like, how do I stand out? What are the things I can do, especially in kind of a strange world that we’re in right now and how things are changing in media?

Yes. All right. So very quickly. So my background, I traveled all the sort of major arenas of marketing after graduating with business and graphic design degree, which is a little odd I realized. I’ve been sort of in a new product and service for my whole career. But I’ve done that on that’s called the client-side or the brand-side. I’ve done it on the media side and the agency, the large agency-side. And now for the last 15 years, I’ve been in the small agency world where I’ve owned my own businesses.

I’m in my second one. Now based on Westport, Connecticut. I did the flight from urban, commuting early long before COVID. About eight years ago, I decided to move my business to a converted post office that I’m in right now, five minutes from home and found no problem finding clients who troll over the world and employees, fortunately, plenty in the area. And the theme again. So for my business, I have always been sort of a right-brain, left-brain approach to new products and services.

And this is where I think people, they struggle with understanding what it means when you go to a consultancy and agency into an outside group to look for help around how to most effectively portray and emote your brand. And I use that word very strongly. Like it’s not just telling, it is emoting. You have to infuse the vision, what your passion in the organization and have it come out in different medium. Right.

Whether it’s the written word, the just the pure print visuals, web visuals.

Right.

It’s very difficult for people to look outside of themselves and accept that inbound. But when they do, they’re like, oh, wow. There’s this neat thing that happens when they realize, like, you are really good at what you do. Why wouldn’t you hire somebody who’s really good at helping you to portray this brand outside? Right?

So you’re describing classically. We worked with big companies and small companies and the small company. You’re describing it perfectly where a founder has come up with an idea and sometimes the idea is something they don’t even know how to do. But they’ve come up with a great idea, and that’s even more problematic because then they have to get someone to do it for them. But typically, again, any small business person knows you have to be the Jack of all trades. But the reality is that you should be focused on what you make or what you provide and not trying to do things you don’t do .

That again in one part of it, where we come in. But to take further what you were saying before, we have a strong belief that your, as we call it, your brand foundation goes beyond your communication. It also goes to everything. It goes to your product form or the way you articulate your service, the way you execute what you do every part of the whole process, from the customer service first gateway to the end, the whole thing and the brands that we look at that are so successful have a lot about that, that every touch point of the experience carries a consistence theme or personality.

And again, a lot of times that happens intuitively, and sometimes you go, everything is great about it. I love this product, but something’s just not working. Oh, they’re really rude when they communicate with me. Oh, I get it in a weird box that doesn’t seem to match the luxury element of the product or all sorts of things. Or they have a website that is really aggressive, and this is supposed to be for something soft and gentle. So there’s all sorts of ways that that has to come together.

And so that again, like I said, we call it a brand foundation, is something that is a starting point for almost every innovation project that we do, even where a client doesn’t even understand that it’s needed until we kind of communicate what it is. And the nice thing about that once you have it and it’s a living, breathing document to use literally every day, we would utilize it as we’re going through the full process of whatever we’re assigned to do with them. But then they really becomes a little bit primer forward, going forward, right down to what’s your brand vocabulary, which is really your communication code.

What is your tone of matter? Like you said, what your emotional and functional drivers? I thought about this for so long, literally, when we create this, it’s like literally twelve pages. It’s not 89, 90 page, a lot of complicated metaphors, and we find it works. And again, it makes our job easier. And it makes the clients job easier as well to frankly communicate to us what they’re after.

The thing that we’ve learned. Luckily, I think over especially the last 20 years, the marriage of behavioral psychology into business in how we saw what, Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, ultimately gave us with. Thinking fast and slow and understand behavioral economics, when to. Behavioral psychologists, one Nobel Prize for economics. We realized that the industries aren’t actually separated. The genres aren’t distinct and diverse away from each other. And now the same thing with brand. It’s not just, you know, you can’t just say, does it look good? Or does it have the right font?

It’s what what are you trying to achieve? When somebody opens this box, they receive your phone call. Like you said, user experience, especially now that we know it’s critical in the flow of how people get to your website, how they sign up to get a demo, what’s that called, like all this crazy stuff that we do. It seems like throw away things sometimes. But as I say, user experience, no one knows good user experience, but you very quickly know bad user experience. Good user experience is like painted room.

When it’s done right, when you paint a whole room and then someone walks in after you paint it, they say, okay, looks good. But if they walked in halfway through, they’d be like, oh, you got a long way to go. It’s immediately obvious that you’re doing this thing, but when it’s done, it just feels right.

That’s right. Or and again, a word often happens when you say something isn’t right.

Right.

Where you say yes. There’s so many things I like about this experience, whether it’s a product experience or service experience, but something isn’t working. That’s the part where you need to think about it. And truth, like I said, when constructed correctly, when you know kind of what your personality should be, what your most important drivers are, then you utilize it. And that’s also, frankly, we do it like to keep it very simple.

So it’s easy for you to communicate to others, to do it that way as well. Like you said, one of your. Interestingly, we had a cosmetic client that a very important driver was fun, which is kind of a weird word in the cosmetic world. Honestly, that became a very, really critical part of literally even creating products for them. But fun in the way that they interpreted. Not like boisterous fun necessarily. But so those kind of things are important because, again, that also, frankly, makes your life simpler.

But, you know, when you read reviews of companies, a lot of times, people. When negative reviews comes down. Oh, I expected this because you communicate some way with this. But I got this. And that disconnect is the place where you go, okay. So how do we not stay true to who we are in that way? Where and where did it fall down? And then you try to fix it.

Yeah. And I’ll say the example I always love to give is, you watch a commercial and it shows people dancing in a field and they go through this whole thing and they show somebody laying on a beach and holding a drink and smiling and laughing and hugging. And then it says, you know, Alandra, and you’re, like, contact your physician. I have no idea what this thing is supposed to do, but there’s no connection to and they don’t mention it because it’s probably a host of disclaimers. But like, I’m completely lost.

You hit one of my pet peeves. And this is that my dislike of focus on what kind of word you want is that there’s lots of great cinematography down out there that has nothing to do with selling a product or service that is gorgeous. It’s a motive. It’s beautiful. At the end of the day, does it make you feel better about the brand you don’t remember what it is? I’m not so sure. So the really genius communication work brings those two things together that you hit a core element of who you are as a brand.

And it doesn’t mean you can’t use associative things, you can. But if they’re so far afield, how does that help you? Same thing I remember an agency that I work with and this beautiful, beautiful work for a bank. And maybe this whole thing about a mother reading a story to a child. And it was a beautiful, gorgeous thing at the end that said, XX Bank. And, of course, recall is really low. In won all sorts of awards, but what does it have to do with the bank?

And of course, the agent said, oh, it’s a soft, warm touch you have with your client. The truth is, you’re asking that consumer to go a big stretch to go from mom reading a book to bank experience because you told me nothing about the bank experience.

Yeah. This is always the I think another thing that people get concerned about when they look to go outside is they sometimes worry that the person creating the asset, like the outcome is looking for, like, they’re looking to win an Emmy for a commercial, not to really, truly connect the brands to customers. There’s an unfortunate thing where we’ve seen things, and sometimes it works like, of course, I’ll call it out. I mentioned I’m not going to mention competitors when I call it sort of the famous Chiat/Day, the 1984 throwing a hammer at the screen.

It had nothing to do with what was there. However, Steve Jobs was, like, perfect. He was like, Ed Wood, just like, this is completely wrong. He says, exactly. And it worked in a weird way. But today we people think that that’s what’s going to happen. They’re going to end up with a cologne ad type of completely discounting be visually appealing. And they fear that you can’t understand my brand as well as I can because I literally created it. And it’s this unfortunate control feeling that a lot of founders have where they’re afraid to have somebody else tell them what they actually feel about the brand when you tell limits.

Sorry, I know this all too well. As I approach people at a time when I do advisory, and there’s a real sense that, like, no one can know me as well as me. Actually, that’s not the case.

The truth is, what we find is it’s unlocking what that me is. So it definitely mean we’re inventing it for the product or service, necessarily, unless they really have no idea. And you have to come up with something. But usually it’s there in some way, you just have to lock it. So the problem, usually for the founder, is just being unable to articulate it. Yeah. And finding that way to articulate is critical. And again, sometimes it’s a little bit of a trial and error kind of situation, but we’re successful.

Ultimately, they go, oh, yeah, that’s sick. So it’s like, literally it’s like I said, it’s not a black boxing thing. Here’s the grand reveal. Here’s who you are. Here’s who you want to be, and they go, okay, great. I never thought of that. It should go, oh, that feels right. That feels like what I met or gosh. I’ve never been able to articulate that in the same way.

It also what I want to ask you, Randy, is like, over the course of time, what you found to be the testing process, right? This is not like four people will interview you for 2 hours, then they go away, and two weeks later, they hand you your press kit, your brand kit, whatever. That’s not how it works. There’s a real interactive, continuous process. So maybe walk folks through what you found to be a successful method in going from I need help with my brand to people saying, okay, it’s working now.

So to your point, I would say the less successful or less effective ones. This woman says, okay, go do this for me. Come back when it’s done presented to me great data that in those situations nine times out of ten, they don’t actually use that. They don’t actually follow it. When we try to do any continued work, creatively against it, they go, okay. Because they haven’t really taken ownership of it. So in the best situation is finding that perfect balance where they’re a part of the process and look for everybody, that level of time commitment is different.

And obviously, thank you. With virtual platforms that’s become a little easier than it used to be, because it doesn’t mean we have to go to you or you have to come to us every time we do that. We always do, of course, a lot of internal work, even behind the scenes. But that ownership piece is really, really critical. So the way we typically try to do it is do it in stages and where we can literally do a little bit of work, do a little check in, and because the work is iterative, it’s a building block.

Okay, so we go to the next stage. We can say, okay, look, we all agreed you were part of this, and they go, yes, that’s familiar. And then how do we get to the next stage? Because you know, frankly, the biggest challenge a consultant or an agency has is getting the right kind of direction from the client. Not that at one end. I don’t know. It just doesn’t feel right.

Right.

Saying, you know, I just want it to be red. Please just make it red. And our answers to both is why?

Why is our most important word? So if you want it to be red, why is red important? Well, because it’s always been red. So what is that trying to tell people? Why is it? Not saying it’s wrong. So as creative people, we want to understand, not just the direction we understand why we’re doing it that way. It doesn’t mean we’re going to do something different. We just need to understand it, because I always say we can either give you exactly what you asked for or what we recommend.

You probably are paying us for what we recommend, but we want what we recommend to be in line with what you want and the other part where they say it just doesn’t feel right. I always say, give me some adjectives. Okay. Is it too much of this? Is it too little of that? Because again, when you speak to us in adjectives, we can start painting a picture to get to the right place. So that is our biggest challenge. And one thing, our brand foundation, where it tries to get at.

But even without it, that is the thing that you always work at trying to get. Because I said, clients end up on one end of the other where they give you no direction at all. And either are happier decided or give you too much direction.

Yeah. And you end up with this thing of like, I don’t know. It feels like it needs more pop. You describe exactly what it is that your after. And the color thing is, as you said, it’s not even that you’re saying it’s right or wrong. It’s tell me what the background is. What made you decide that that’s important, what makes this valuable to you and how you portray your brand or your company, and it can be. I like yellow. My daughter, it’s her favorite color.

Okay. It’s great. I take, are you trying to be the ideal psychological color to draw people in to make them feel calm? Like, no, my daughter likes yellow. Perfect. That’s a boundary, will work within that.

Even there you say, how does that make her feel? And how does that feeling transit you makes her feel safe. Great. So it’s feeling safe as in safety of security. Is that part of what you want to communicate? Then you’re getting somewhere, then you’re getting a place that you can work with versus just simply saying it’s the color that I like. Because, frankly, even with anything, particularly with color or things, it’s not a non emotional response. We always have an emotional response to color in some way, whether we recognize it or not.

And obviously color is just one element. But that is like you said early on, the emotional response. It’s important. Look at that. Also, we also have functional drivers. There are functional things that brands and services need to do that are not necessarily emotional, but both have to sort of work together.

And when it comes to train the customer as part of their brand, like you said, we could show the things and they may look visually fantastic. But if it doesn’t actually connect you to what the customers either currently experiencing or will experience as a result of engaging with this company or product, that’s why it’s so important. And even we say, like, a thing can be fantastic. Right? This is an amazing bottle. I love this bottle. It fits beautifully into my cupboard, whatever the reason is. But if it wasn’t water that I like to drink, it wouldn’t matter that the bottle fits perfectly in my cupboard.

It is truly matching all of these requirements. And the most important one being I really like the water.

Right. Which is okay. And sometimes, well, I really like the water, but it’s so hard, it doesn’t fit anywhere. I can’t open the top. So you know what? I’ll find another water. So that functionally you are kind of love the idea of that. I love being seen holding that. It’s very cool, but it’s such so difficult, so many obstacles to get there that I don’t want to continue. It’s funny. We do a fair amount of work in industrial design and packaging as well. And we’ve recently worked with two clients said to add spectrum, one that very much about meticulous detail and ceremony and all that kind of stuff.

And so when we were doing the packaging, so I always think packages to sort of open like a present in some way should have some kind of ritual. For that one end, it had let’s just say, lots of layers. You’ve had some elements to get to and storytelling that unfolded, and it completely fit the product for the other product. It was really all about efficiency and time savings. So it had to be as simple as possible. So I said, okay, this is the opposite. So no layers, don’t make it an origami opening.

I got to make it so kind of ingeniously simple. It was funny what we ended up with. I did exactly that. So basically, when you open the package, the product base popped out at you in a way without falling in your lap. But that would fit what that user expected, which was I want to get there 2 seconds because this is a fast, efficient product. So that’s again, about just really paying attention to your full product experience.

And another one. I’ll use an example, and I’m going to pick a specific branch because it’s interesting where the brand is actually completely opposite to the product. However, it’s part of their choice. And there’s a company called Liquid Death, and they make water. Flat water and sparkling water. It comes in cans that have, like, a devil face on it. They look like it’s like an energy drink or 17% beer, and their whole thing is murder, your thirst and all the stuff. And in the end, it’s literally water.

But they specifically said, we’re going to create this crazy brands like the red bowl of water. And so it’s almost like at the antithesis of the actual product. But in this case, it’s actually working out well for them. So I’m curious, Randy, when you see also, where does that work? Where you can have these almost like a dichotomy in the presentation. But yet it gets you to a place where you’re like, oh, cool. I dig this product because I dig their branding.

So it’s actually great in my country. Love what I would call paradoxes or juxtapositions. That is okay, because sometimes you need just that we have a brand, new brand we’re working right now where our overarching theme is what we’re calling modern nostalgia. So to us, it has these particular brand. There is the nostalgia element that’s really important, but for the audience for reaching, we don’t want to look old, that we have to be sort of nostalgic cast in a new way. And so those juxtapositions can work.

The only thing I would tell you, sometimes, like the example you said, it can get gimmicky. It can be clever. Yes, it’s great to draw somebody, but at the end of the day, you go say, right, I’m selling water. I keep wanting to say that if I don’t like the water and it’s not something that’s affordable, accessible, I probably will say, yeah, it was clever and cool, but I’m not going to keep doing it. Or if it still passes all those other elements you brought them in through the cleverness and he kept them, which is great.

Bringing them in is, of course, if you can’t do that, you can’t get them to stay. So that’s the key with kids, though, it isn’t. You don’t live only on that. Because again, there are plenty of brands out there that have great wrappings, all sorts that are funny, they’re cool, they love it. But then when you get inside, you go, okay. The wrapping was great, the inside was, okay. So if the inside doesn’t also pay off, then you’re not going to keep them.

Yeah. And sometimes as another famous, I actually don’t even know who did their branding on, of course, is Buckley’s Mixture. If you know that one, then it’s awful stuff. And eventually they just changed and said, let’s embrace it. And their slogan became it taste awful, but it works, right?

I thought it works is all right. So what they’re doing, which is clever there is they’re saying, you know what? You’re going to have an obstacle here. It’s going to have an obstacle but the other day is going to be worth it. Okay. And that’s okay. You know, it’s funny. A famous German liquor brand did this where again, they taste absolutely atrocious, it’s really an apparent thing, actually. But they embraced it completely and made it part of their thing. But the other day, it was high alcohol. That’s why people were drinking it.

Okay. So the truth is. But they embrace the fact that you’re gonna hate drinking it. It’s not a drinking experience that’s going to be enjoyable. And so that’s okay. But again, they’re still at the end, something that says it was worth doing for whatever reason, I’ve chosen to do it. If that part doesn’t work, that’s where it falls off the cliff. I worked early in my career, actually, for a brand that was really what’s called a popular price sort of discount brands, but very popular. But they’re chosen communication was very upscale and aspirational and beautiful.

And again, it won awards and all that kind of stuff. But people just really disconnect. They said, you know, I’ve seen these beautiful, gorgeous scenes and all these things. And then I basically find it at Walmart for 299. Where do those two connect? I don’t understand what I’m supposed to do so, not sure but the company said, stop getting a million dollars for this production, this commercial. Not that we have to be downscale, but let’s meet our customer where they’re buying our product. And that’s be more communicative above that level.

Yeah. If you don’t want to pay Kendall Jenner to stand outside of a Dollarama and put it on Instagram, like, it’s not going to connect the customer to the actual emotive experience that they’re going to have. And the reason why they’ve chosen the brand again, each completely right target audience. Fantastic. Target influencer obviously delivers has proven to deliver in some cases, but you just can’t just mush them together and have it automatically work. Right?

That’s right. Absolutely.

Now in the discovery process. And that’s why I love to have you walk a bit further into Randy. When you’re tapping somebody to like, let’s whittle it down to the simplest word. What’s that process look like? As you first sort of sit down in the room and said, you know what we want to come out of this room with and how far are we going to get here today? And what does that process look like?

So we start with what is classy called drivers, motivational drivers. And there’s not a magic number, but it’s often three, emotional and three, functional. It’s one of the hardest things that we do, because again, they have to be distinct. They have to be relevant, and they have to be easy to understand. So even when we come up with words going, I always say, if you have to explain it in more than a sentence, then it doesn’t work. It has to be very, very simple. So that’s the real starting point.

And then we usually take that then take those drivers and model them against consumer profiles that we either know we’re going to be there or maybe there. Now again, qualitative testing can absolutely depending on the brand be in there. And in fact, it’s funny. We’ve been qualitative testing on Zoom and other platforms for many years because you get way better people and they’re not sitting in a focus group facility, and it’s cheaper and faster everything else. So sometimes that process happens. But regardless of that part happens, those drivers, then putting them into consumer segments tells us a lot.

Sometimes we have to back out of the consumer segments and go, you know what we thought this was the driver, but it’s not fitting anywhere. It just sort of, it’s not unique. It’s not distinct so we have to go backwards. But there’s still a direct connection. So that’s another critical step. And then we take from there we then have a really good idea after doing that, understanding how it fits in contact with whoever our segments, that could be consumer could be business segments. And then we build a personality and the personality.

We do a personality ladder, which again starts with attributes of who you are just elements to describe what you are and then go through emotional, functional articulation. And then the personality works. And what I like about that is that, you know, agency that are saying, here’s your brand personality, and you go, so why am I confident? Where did that come from? So the personality letters let you show, so this is where it came from. I understand, started from here. And so that’s the purpose of that. And so again, that’s just sort of the starting gate, the funny last pace.

And again, a lot of we build this off classical models field what is for become statements, which is always hard to write, is usually what comes next. How do we, basically, one, a little bit long sentence describe everything about who we are. So we had to say the old elevator speech. Describe who your are, we are this for this because of this. And that statement happens next. So again, these are all sort of iterative. And where we go from there is into literally building what we call brand vocabulary, which are one of the words that you use consistently or should use consistently.

And these aren’t necessarily invented words. They are words that are in common lexicon. But the words that you may use frequently because they connect to your drivers because they speak to your audience and from a digital world. Yet it’s great to have contextual consistent words. It’s great for SEO, blah, blah, blah. But more importantly, when your customer or consumer starts seeing these words from you, it’s the short hand of saying this is what I mean. So when I say this word, it has a very specific meaning.

Just like, when you talk to anybody, everybody has their own turns of phrases. You start to know what they mean when they say that it’s the same thing for a brand. So that’s sort of the nutshell. There’s a few other elements. But that’s a nutshell process. And the great part of all of that is that once you’ve gotten to that point, building that out as a creative articulation or credit platform is easier, because now you have words and actives and context and understanding that then can lead you to how your visual expression will come to life.

And frankly, which, of course, always has the subjectivity to it is you’re in dialogue with your client on that you come to a meaning and an understanding of what certain things mean. So if let’s say one of the things that there is romantic. So for the context of a brand or a client point of view, that might mean one thing, and we may say something else, and we have to come to a joining point where we both say, yeah, that’s what that word means for us. For this brand.

The thing that I want to hone in on to is the specific words that we get hung on. But it’s important that we have to, like you said, get that foundation there, because it often leads to people say, what is your product do? Like, let’s just say, makes the applications faster. You’re like, okay, cool. So everything you do make something faster? Well, sometimes it stops it from failing. Okay. So it’s not just about faster. It’s faster while reducing risk. Like, okay, we’re getting warm. And then the words that you can do, does it make it cheaper, more expensive?

Once you effectively build the fences around what it does and what it doesn’t do, then it gives you the freedom. Like you said, you are free to take that base, that foundation. And then words will always have to come back to that core. But it’s very easy, without the consistency of those words, that one sales person will describe it as we make yourself go fast, one person will say, we make yourself go faster. And some people say, we make sure we stop your stuff from being slow.

Right.

They may all mean exactly the same thing and talk about the same product, but the inconsistency of the message, it’s framing as well. Like, the reason we chose faster versus fast. There’s a framing element to it. There’s a lot of stuff buried in the choice of word. And if you don’t have that at the start, then you can’t walk around and said, I don’t understand why my sales folks don’t get more meetings or don’t close more deals. And you realize because I’ve been on seven sales calls and it sounds like seven different products, that’s exactly right.

And that’s yet another voice of the brand that has to be consistent. And by the way, it also has to be understandable for that salesperson and meaningful to sell well. And it really all comes down to point of difference. Is like any brand will have parity with other brands in some ways, but it’s the old 1+1=3. The way we put our pieces together provide unique opportunity, which could be any element of the marketing mix that helps them do that or that we do the same way. But somehow we do just incrementally a little bit better.

As you’re talking earlier. One of the things that comes to mind to sometimes choosing certain words very carefully. And not promising, over promising on your brand. So, for instance, we’ve worked recently on some food products that are I wouldn’t call them health food products, but they’re way better for you than the alternative.

A healthier option.

The healthier, healthier. This is a healthy product. That’s kind of overselling. Truth is, it’s not as bad for you as the alternative, which is completely unhealthy. But you don’t want to say it’s a health product because it’s not, it’s healthier or better for you. So all that is a true statement. So again, back to the out end user, they’ll get an idea that you’re not saying, oh, this is a health food product, and I’m gonna like, oh, but it does say, you know what? I’m making this choice because it’s better than the alternative.

But by the way, it doesn’t make me sacrifice taste or whatever else. But being really honest, not over promising is also really, really important. So like, to your earlier point, you can’t say we are the fastest product on the market if that’s actually true. Yay. Screaming it off the rooftops. But the truth is, is that we are going to make things faster is probably an easier and more believable sell.

Another one, this word is really one that people use very often, and I find it gets lost because it’s a dangerous thing. And I got taught this lesson by the founder of the company I’m at actually, we used to say, like, we’re doing this. We saw that we’re unique in the way we do with it. Or it’s a unique product. And because it was it was patented, it was differentiated from other things. But there’s a difference between saying differentiated and unique. And he would listen to people tell this thing, and then he would say, I want to stop you for a second.

When you were, did you have a lot of friends when you were young? And it was this funny story he would walk you with through and you could watch it. After a while, I would see he uses the same sort of shtick all the time. Do you have a lot of friends when you were a kid? They’re ike, well, yeah. Do you have a lot of friends now? Was it because you were unique?

I, no. Was it unique the thing that made it important that you have friends? Like, no. Okay, so when we look at what we do. And what our product does, does unique matter to the customer or does what we do matter to the customer?

It suddenly hits them like, but you throw this word and it’s very easy to put these words in. And he’s like, it doesn’t actually move the value by using this word.

Yeah. Different for different sakes they say, isn’t a selling point. Look at difference in a sea of where there’s the same obstacle, every other thing in your category, and you’ve solved that obstacle. Great. That is your difference. But like I said earlier, it’s the combination that makes a difference that you provide this in parity as good as everybody else. You do this in a little bit different way, but you’re less expensive. Okay. So you say you reduce a barrier so you’re not getting anything less. You’re paying a little less.

You’re paying a little more. But you’re getting these other things that you wouldn’t otherwise that are meaningful to you. Now sometimes too, frankly, it’s the old classic gilding the lily. You’ll say, okay, this is more expensive. We’re going to add all this gild to them that you don’t really care about. Yeah, it’s going to make it look more expensive, right. Okay. So you put it in a fancier box, but it’s the same product. Why will I pay more just for a fancier box? I don’t eat the box. I eat what’s inside.

So it’s just realizing what things are going to be meaningful to the end user.

It’s interesting when you bring this up. Where does pricing come in in the discussions around creating a brand element and a visual brand?

So that’s really interesting because, again, price in any category is something that always comes into play, because ultimately, when you’re creating a product or service, you say, oh, I want to do this and this and this and this and this. Then you go, oh, my God, sticker shock. That’s going to cost us so much. We’re either going to make no money or have to be really expensive. So you then start curating what you can do. The reality is that price can be an obstacle in different ways, you can actually be too cheap.

And people will say, I I don’t trust this because it’s not expensive enough. I mean, I know I do this myself. I’ll look for something that I want to buy on Amazon, or wherever. I go, I’m not going to buy the cheapest one because they sound good, but it’s way cheaper. I’ll go somewhere in the middle, right. But the reality is that price is important and look at it’s. Okay. Sometimes to have a higher price if it is justifiable. But again, that will also weigh on increments.

If this stuff get used all the time, a relatively higher price is going to have to be a huge benefit for me to do this. If it’s for somebody who use less frequently, yeah. Maybe I’ll justify it. Right. But it’s just one of those, you know, consideration of barriers. But the reality is that it’s also understanding what that classic price sensitivity area is. Being $0.10 more may not make a difference. Okay. Being $10 more might. Okay. And it all depends on your expectation. So a lot of times, particularly with newer companies, they end up just wanting so much in there that they say, oh, we’re going to make no money for the first two years because we just want to always in there.

And then they realize after two years, okay, they love what we have. We can’t make it any higher price, and we don’t make any money. Eventually, our investors are going to stop investing us because we’re in a no win situation here. And then they learn either we have to cut a few things away and we realize we love, but they’re that important that allows us to make a little margin. Or maybe we need experience, we go up a little bit of price and still maintain what we’ve got.

So price is a really critical thing, I would say rarely is it the only driver. Measuring something that is purely commodity. And then it doesn’t matter. But it’s just where it fits into the overall mix.

The thing that often in the way that you can tell that story can be simple and effective, you know, a little more, a lot better. Whatever, like some sort of tag line type of thing that often immediately pushes like, we understand we’re a little bit more than the alternative.

Right.

Let’s talk about what you really want to get out of, why people use us. And then that’s the other thing is introducing peer validation and the proof points when you’re looking, especially when a customer, sorry, a company is very early in their brand and they don’t have proof points. I’m curious, Randy. How do you see that story when it’s not there yet?

To your point, one of the things you just said, some kinds of testimonials are important. If you can get someone saying whether it could be an expert, it could be an even advisor, ultimately should be an end user that gives some kind of validation. That what you’re saying is not just you saying it, but that it’s real. That’s really important. It’s funny. On the flip side, I was thinking earlier from one of the things that a lot of times pays huge value when you’re in a different situation, we call the brand mantle. Right? So certain brands just have that at eye view.

Right. So I know it’s from this brand. It’s interesting. I bought an outdoor grill this summer for a new patio, and I ended up buying a brand that was actually funny. It was pretty inexpensive, but it was brand I totally loved and was aspirational to me. So I took a leap saying, you know, it’s only inexpensive size, and that makes me concerned. But it’s from this brand. So I feel okay now unfortunately, it turned out okay. But that brand mantle did have an added value for me.

Now I can go both ways. You can have a brand mantle that says they only do inexpensive things. They do them really well. And so buying electric product may not work, but it might. So it’s understanding where that trust mantle is. And so look at that’s why companies put millions of dollars on their balance sheets for what they call goodwill. Brand goodwill has a huge amount of value for the customer. And again, like you said, in a place where you don’t have it yet, you just know that it’s important to build, because if you don’t build that, then it’s all just on your product.

And then it also becomes commodity and easy to knock off.

You know, another thing that’s interesting is that when people become so I’m going to buy this thing no matter what. I really dig this brand. And often I don’t want the packaging. I don’t want the frills. I’m like, Look, I get it. I’m going to buy this anyway. My thing that was funny is when I lived in Vancouver and there was this amazing coffee shop there, and they did fantastic artisanal coffee. And gentlemen with handlebar mustaches. And they’re doing the little latte art. And they’re drawing the face of Jesus in your latte.

And at one point, I’m like, “Dude, I got to get to a meeting. You don’t need to do the heart like, you don’t need to just like, literally, pour it in the cup”, but they’re like, no, this is part of our experience. They will not let it go at the door unless it’s right. And then the funny thing is, you’re gonna take a plastic lid and you’re gonna mush it on top. And what started off as this beautiful heart will come out the other side looking like it was shot out of a cannon.

Right. That’s right. But again, honestly, that’s where you make the choice. If I need a fast cup of coffee, I’m going to go to Starbucks or Dunkin Donuts. If I want to reward myself. I’m going to go here. So they’re making a brand decision there, too. And a good or better and different. That’s a choice. It’s the same thing when choosing something that is based on the time you have to do it. And other ones just say, I’m going to spend a little more time. So example for me is that we buy some meal services where you get the box and you have to make it at home.

So we started with one that nothing was pre prepared at all and also was pretty indulgent. So that was a concern. So we landed on another one, which was like, the perfect mix. Things are semi prepared, meaning they give you half of a vegetable that’s already cored. And they do this thing. It’s packaged in paper, so it’s not sustainable. But so it takes us instead of 40 minutes to make dinner takes 20. But it’s kind of fun that it takes 20. I do a little bit of chopping and a little bit of this, and I’m not just getting everything already ready to put it into, like, a microwave.

So it’s finding the balance and what the customer will pay for.

Another thing that’s interesting to think about. Vancouver was a classic case where the brand itself and the product itself, almost to be tied to that juxtaposition, can be sort of disconnected. There’s a company that people may know is called Boston Pizza. What they may not know is that Boston Pizza is headquartered in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. And if anything, you know that Boston is not famous at all for pizza, yet somehow a very strong and well adored brands. But all of it, none of it actually maps out in the end.

And at one point, they could just get bought by Nestle or some other company. Even the original brands may not survive the life of the company because of the way the financials work. But when you get that kind of a situation, Randy, like, how often do you see that? And how do you position it when they’re again these sort of like juxtapositions of things, but in the end, you just have to create the experience for the customer?

So you’re sort of articulating is ultimate would be the brand story. Right? So the reality is that having a brand story is important. But even how you get there is okay. The reason that they’re Boston Pizza and they’re from Vancouver. There’s a story behind that. And as long as that story articulate, it’s not like, oh, we’re presenting to be in Boston, and we’re just not going to let you know that it’s not really true then that’s artificial but the truth is there’s going to be a brand story behind there.

And that’s what’s important. You know, this is similar example, we worked with a very large beer company and the craft beer is exploding and everything like that. And they actually did a lot of beer production in Mexico. And they said, but craft beer all seems to be in the US. It’s all Seattle and Boulder and blah, blah, blah. And we discovered in a process that, you know what, as long as it has a story and authenticity, it can be from anywhere. It can be from Mexico. So not every Mexican beer is cheap and just about the beach.

It can have a story and really hardcore craft beer lovers got it. And they understood it. And frankly, we wouldn’t have known that if we hadn’t done some consumer work to really unveil that, wouldn’t believe that if we said it. So that brand story is really important. Just again, whatever it is, frankly, people find it really interesting when people who it doesn’t mean you had to grow up always doing this or aspiring to do this, you could have a turning point in your life where you said I had a pass over this or had a problem I had to solve.

And so I did it. I solved it. Okay. That’s gonna be interesting to people. They don’t care that. Oh, you grew up your whole life wanting to make shoe lace.

Yeah.

It doesn’t matter, you know. The fact that you figured out at some point either based on a problem you had or inspiration you have is kind of cool. And frankly, people relate to that.

There is another thing that you talked before about healthy, healthier. This gets into an interesting area that people don’t always get. And I know, of course, the phrase we use is called puffery, right? When we use specific phrases to describe a product, it’s like we say, you know, 20% better than the competitor. Like, there are legal ramifications to the statements that we make. And when we say stuff like organic, organically sourced, made in or manufactured in the United States or like, what Apple does this right. They say designed in Cupertino.

Right.

Well, that’s great. But it was manufactured in a factory in China, but it doesn’t say that in the product, it says designed in Cupertino, because there’s a specific phrase and that’s the limit. It is legitimately designed in Cupertino. They can legally say that. But when we get to those things, like, better, faster, fastest. What are the kind of rules around that stuff, Randy?

So as you pointed out, some of them are absolute regulatory. So if you work in the pharmaceutical or the liquor or spirits, or they are very specific, you can and can’t say. Even the food business, the word ‘organic’ isn’t just allowed to say for anything if you’re not truly organic. And there are also all bunch of other certifications you can or can’t have. And so you have to be very, in those it’s specific. And it’s funny, particularly in the first two categories we’ve mentioned, you end up hearing a lot of nuances where they can directly say this, but they’re meaning this.

And the customer finally kind of figures out that’s what it means. But they can’t say it the other time is when things are all the same. Organic is a perfect example. Everybody, they don’t believe that anymore because everybody is organic. And frankly, even not everybody is a good job explaining why is organic important? And so really smart companies have figured out a way to if that’s important claim explain why it’s important. What part of that is really meaningful to you as an end customer by saying that it’s organic, but as always, it’s recognizing what are those things that are really going to matter to the end customer that are saying. Just because it’s important to us is going to be important to them.

At the end, we have another client that has an EU certification for traceability back to the roots of every bit of their product. And their product actually is not a food product. So it’s kind of interesting, really important to them. And one of the things that it’s relative in your client, we’re going to sort of learn is, is that important to the end user? And the reality is, it could very well be. It could be, wow, that’s a huge point of difference. And everybody else. And they’re, will mistrust other products because they’re not traceable, but it’s understanding and ultimately seeing where the end consumer falls on that.

And I guess that really would come through sort of the testing. There’s a restaurant that I’ve been to in a couple of locations, and their big thing is effectively kind of like 100-mile diet. They use 100-mile sourcing, and they actually draw a map on a chalkboard, and it has a little chalk market that says tomatoes from this place. So you see the regional map. Again, most people that walk in, it may not even matter, but to a lot of folks, they can say that’s a factor that they bring in.

I like supporting a local economy, and that’s a feel good that maybe their burger probably doesn’t taste better than any other burger. But this is a factor to me that makes me move towards this brand.

So a given angle there, which is sort of interesting that a lot of companies don’t speak to then that, but it’s really the root of that, which is reducing carbon footprint. So the reality is buying in a local sourcing. Yes, it’s great to support the local economy, but the real root of that was I’m not driving my tomatoes a thousand miles to get here or I’m not buying that drive. So I’ve reduced my carbon footprint. Now there are some buzz word or area that people understand better, see is more meaningful.

And so that would be the thing to say. Rather, just, hey, we bought local. Yay. We bought local. The other thing, of course, sometimes is freshness, and they can articulate that. And the other instances saying that less pesticides and all those other things, too. But it’s really understanding what parts of those are meaningful. It’s really interesting. I worked with a client in the stack food area who decided instead of using corn, to use sorghum. What the hell is a sorghum? It’s a very low water produce. Right. And so they really took the time to say so this is why it’s important.

And literally, over the course of year, we could save 500,000 gallons of water, which means that three towns would have regular water supply. So that all then became in contact. You go, oh, now I get it. And by the way, the product taste the same as corn.

Right.

And again, the consumer didn’t say, oh, I’m saving 500 dozen gallons, but it tastes like crap. You know, it still tastes okay. But it was a meaningful choice to make that choice to reduce the carbon footprint to produce water usage.

That’s what I love is in the process of actually talking to customers and going to the world. It’s such a merger of many things. Which is why, again, I really respect what you and the team are doing because you bring this approach. This is what you know you have to go to many areas versus like a founder, a creator or whatever it is. They have to be laser focused on just building a great product, bringing it to market needs that push of an outside voice and understanding of the behavioral psychology that makes this work, the economics of how to plant it and position it.

It all stems from that foundation. Like you said, when if it is from the roots of this foundation, then everything will always be born of the right tree. If it doesn’t work, then you don’t chop off the branch. You go back to the root and say, was it, did it lose something along the way? Are we missing the mark at this point? It’s super easy for people to you sort of get hung on a thing. And especially once brand lives a little while and you bring in more outside voices because at first, if you develop your first sales team, they’re going to basically be for lack of that word, indoctrinated with, this is what we do. This is why we’re different. This is why we’re better. This is why customers need us.

You’re going to tell the story this way and they do this and they’re like, okay, cool. Well, now you have 100 sales people. You’re hiring them at five a week and then to leave because of attrition like, you’ve got this continuous flow. If you don’t have that root documents that sort of brand vision somewhere, the next thing you know, they’d be like, hey, we’ve got really great pistachios. And I find that when I tell people that it’s cheaper than the other ones, I’ve closed a bunch of deals and so that becomes like a playoff beard for them.

They’re like, I’m just going to keep saying it’s cheaper and you’re like, no, no, no, you don’t get it. None of those customers you just got are repeat customers.

Right. Right.

Because although you achieve your metric, the brands did not. And this again becomes like we talked before, bringing them in is one thing. Retaining them and getting recurring revenue is the really the goal of any company.

And look, it’s not to diminish the important to bringing them in the first time is critical, because if you don’t, you’ve a number off now, right? But again, often too much effort is spent only on that. And is that, wow, we have 10,000 new customers, but our repeat business is 2%. That’s a big warning signal, right. Because you have either over promised, under delivered, blah, blah, blah, something didn’t work. First as I get, I’d rather start from here and said we have 2000 new customers, but 1500 of them return that’s something to build off of.

Okay, well, we’d hope to get 10,000, but we have an 80% return rate. Wow. Then we just need to figure out what’s working there and keep doing the same thing versus the other way around. We would have to say, wow. So clearly, we’ve got an attractive message or something or product or the way we’re pushing in the market, but something’s not working. Let’s go back and ask some of those people didn’t come back and say, why didn’t you come back? And that’ll help us get to the right zone.

And I’ll ask a question. Let’s just say there’s a change. Like, let’s say the company is ten years old. They want, they’re pivoting something. How do you re-infuse that now? Like, how do you revisit brand? Because sometimes there’s even just a business change that’s occurred. Geico was famous. Of course, they’re, like, 15 minutes will save you 15%, whatever. And at some point, they realized we need to stop anchoring on that. And they’ve adjusted it. They actually played it up because they chose a very consumer, strong consumer, lots of advertising, lots of whatever.

And that was they had to shift their brand. I worked for a company called Raymond James, so that’s white in color. And one of the things we often said was 222 consecutive quarters of growth.

Right.

It was super valuable because it shows we’re conservative, we’re consistent, and they’ve maintained that. They continue to add to the number. But what if all of a sudden you miss one? You’re like, 222 consecutive quarter growth, then we missed two, then we’re back on track.

That’s right.

So now at some point, they need to say, okay, we need some new messaging.

That’s right. Or you say we have grown instead of consecutive quarters of growth. We have grown X amount in the last ten years. So you find a new way to cast that message. But I think to your point. And this is also sometimes a thing that is a mistake. People end up going having a style gathered brand platform, whatever it is and say, oh, my God. That is what we have to do always everywhere even if we don’t understand it or we don’t believe it anymore.

You have to recognize that sometimes things have to evolve. Doesn’t mean you break rules there consistently. But if something has changed or isn’t work anymore, then address it, you know. You learn things that you’ve been in the market. Or, like you said, there’s a need to evolve. Big brands think that are very successful that start to fade, are terrified about making changes because they say, oh, my God. We have a huge business that’s so high risk. And yet the see their business steadily decline.

And the reality is, you got to change something now. By the way, it doesn’t mean you change everything.

Right.

You need to understand what can’t you change? But there are things you can change that will again reintroduce the end user to your product or service that will bring them back. But you have to know how far to go. And by the way, sometimes it is drastic. But if it’s drastic, then you’re really saying I may lose everything, but I don’t have any other choice. Okay. And that at Christmas it’s dropping 30% a year, and God, who cares?

It’s going to be gone in three years anyways. Or you say, you know what? I’m going to have to do this a little incrementally, because I see how much is enough.

And also brand brand saving or brand recovering expeditions. Right. I’ll use a bit of a harsh example, but like BP, they were able to, not obviously, they have such a presence it’s hard to unseat them. But nothing is, nothing is protected from going away. And they were able to despite some really, really, obviously difficult and environmentally horrifying experiences that were introduced, they kind of just said, okay, let’s go mea culpa on this and say, like, we’ve made mistakes, and we understand that you need to learn to trust us again.

And they really walked to the market and went visually with it. They went to commercials audit. They said, we’re going to blanket the world with this. What was the other one? Tylenol great example, right. When Tylenol had the problem with pills that were tainted and somebody had died as a result before we had the sealed tops, right? The FDA said, whatever you do, don’t like, just get the old ones off the shelf and just keep going, like and they said, we’re going to get all of them.

We are going to start from scratch, and they are actually advised to not do it. But in making that choice of saying full mea culpa of massive things just changed in our industry. And we are starting again, and it resulted in them really surviving as a brand versus if they sort of just tried to incrementally, just tuck it away, they probably would not have had the success they have. So I’m curious again, Randy, and when people come to you and say, like, Randy, we’ve had a big change and we need to make sure the story comes through.

So for starters is being honest, you can’t, when you have a big issue that really is damaging to you for one way or the other, you can’t just ignore it. Did you ignore it? People keep saying, what about that? What about that? You have to and frankly, always say honesty is the best policy to be very transparent on it and explain what you did to rectify it. It’s interesting. I actually think it’s great when I see companies doing customer service on social media. Think, oh, my God, you’re exposing people who are not happy.

Reality is, the real great way is how you solve their problems or listen to them, right? Or address their interest. There’s another person who say, oh, yeah, they had that problem, but wow, that company was responsive, and they did the right thing. And they were able to explain, rather, just getting a negative review, right? And so I think it’s just the way you address it is really, really important. And then in some of these, it’s so dramatic that you have to really say we’re walking away from this.

But we’re doing this instead. Years ago, I work at, you remember the Enron, flame out in Texas. So we were involved in rebranding one of their legal firms.

Oh, wow.

Oh, my God. We had no illegal issue ultimately at that. But then they were directly associated with Enron. They went, oh, my God. Nobody wants to work with us anymore. And so what they had to do is really recast the brand. They didn’t change their name, unfortunately, because that had a legacy. But they did definitely recast what they did. In fact, one of the things they did is walked away from that sector for a while. They said, okay, that’s a hot potato. So let’s focus on other sectors.

But what they decided not to do is hide from us. Obviously, Enron no longer period of their client list. They did rebrand to give a new fresh look to introduce themselves new places. But they didn’t say, pretend that never happened. Yeah.

This is also like you said, social media. And I hate to do this. We only have a few minutes left. But this is an important piece where the brands then continues in an active voice. And there sometimes people chose the sort of like the can’t be fun, edgy type of thing. Right. You’ve got Wendy’s social media having a run at Burger King, like, the edit becomes cute. It’s viral, but it also impacts the if they suddenly switch, it’s obvious noticeable, and it takes away trust. Every once in a while, somebody will put out a promoted tweet because of something.

And they say a BP or an Enron or whatever. Somebody that’s. All you see is the reply count, just like ticking up and you’re like, oh, good golly. They’re trying but you’re like, this is not the medium in which you want to bring this message out here. And social media really affect the continuation of that visual brand.

So again, the social media is obviously a really critical channel for any brand today. And what we talk about a lot is just using the right platform for the right kind of message, just using Twitter as a perfect example. That’s the newest platform. If you don’t have something that’s topical to newsworthy items, don’t be tweeting. Nobody cares that you’re introducing a new flavor of granola bar. Just doesn’t matter. It’s not the place that they’re looking for that information. They might be looking for that on Instagram because Instagram is interest based, right?

Pinterest borrowed interest and interest base. Okay. Facebook community stories connection with people, right. And actually has a little broader mantle then as well. If you’re looking for something that’s very business to business. Yes, LinkedIn is absolutely the right place to do that. In fact, in LinkedIn probably may not be the right place to put a big emotional story about something that no one when the business mindset is going to care about. So it’s really understanding where and how to do it. The other reality is too, and I think people have known this for a while is that you can’t just like, put things out in social media, expect you’re going to build an audience because it’s going to get viral.

Yeah, that happens. That’s not science completely. That’s a lot of chance and winning the lottery and having the right place at the right time. So promoted posts and stuff are the reality. You got to do it. You got to do it. Then you have to experiment with it. All the social platforms today actually have pretty sophisticated tensions to allow you to do that in a pretty economic way. But we tell that to clients that, that isn’t definitely is a check the box. But don’t get all sad because you’ve got 200 followers on Instagram after three months because all you do is put it out there because yeah, 200 people happen to find you.

With all your friends and family are following you. But if you really want to get it further, you got to promote it. But it is as viable as a place as any other digital media place to do it. Somebody with a good digital plan definitely does it not only social media, but social media certainly is a critical component to it.

Yeah, this is as a holistic approach, and I think that’s what lose sight of it’s like they choose one thing, and it also where you make sure you can be consistent in your usage of any platform. Right. You come up with a fantastic if you pay all this money for a visual ad and then you fire it up and you use your impressions and then you stop using it. That’s a failure in your understanding of what the platform is meant to do and how you get an ROI from this platform, even though it’s a beautiful image, a beautiful video you created.

If you just hammered it into the ecosystem, it’s timing, right? Like an amazing movie comes out on a Friday and does 14 million, and then it came out three weeks later. The same movie could get 4 million. Why? Because Harry Potter came out the same day. So it’s timing placements. But what I really want to branch back to is it’s about taking the foundation of your company, your vision, your customer story, and making sure that it’s from the roots of that. And for folks that want to make sure that they can do this right.

Randy, what’s the best way if they want to contact you and the team at Visual Brand?

So our website is thevisualbrand.com. And I am Randy, R-A-N-D-Y at visualbrand.com.

Excellent. Randy, this is really good. There’s so much more I could tap into. We talk about, we can talk about influence and other things. I’d love to have you back and go into some of those areas because I know it’s. It’s a keen interest to a lot of folks these days of where is the right place to use some of these things. And I know you’ve done a lot of work in this, but I didn’t want to truncate it to a two minute hunk of our discussion, but it’s been really great.

Thank you very much for spending the time.

Thank you, Eric. I enjoyed it thoroughly.

Sponsored by our friends at Veeam Software! Make sure to click here and get the latest and greatest data protection platform for everything from containers to your cloud!


Sponsored by the Shift Group – Shift Group is turning athletes into sales professionals. Is your company looking to hire driven, competitive former athletes? Shift Group not only offers a large pool of diverse sales candidates from entry level to leadership – they help early stage companies in developing their hiring strategy, interview process and build strong sales cultures that attract the best talent for early stage companies.


Sponsored by the 4-Step Guide to Delivering Extraordinary Software Demos that Win DealsClick here and because we had such good response we have opened it up to make the eBook and Audiobook more accessible by offering it all for only 5$


Sponsored by Diabolical Coffee. Devilishly good coffee and diabolically awesome clothing


Does your startup need strategic technical content? The team at GTM Delta delivers SEO-optimized, compelling content that connects your company with technical users to help grow your credibility, and your pipeline.


Need Podcast gear? We are partnered up with Podcast Gear Pro to share tips, gear ideas and much more. Check it out at PodcastGearPro.com.


Rob Carpenter is the CEO and Founder of Valyant AI, the first Artificially Intelligent “Digital Employee” to work directly alongside employees in customer facing roles. Valyant’s AI “Holly” works in fast food restaurants to greet customers at the drive-thru post, answer questions and take food orders. The revolutionary nature of this technology is that it pulls AI from being a hidden back-office tool, to something that feels like a real staff member, which humanizes a brands personality and brings the AI
experience front and center to a physical location.

We discuss the power of their technology, the ethics of AI and the effect on jobs, plus how to empower people with technology and in the startup ecosystem.  Another great chat that is a must-listen for founders everywhere.

Check out Valyant AI here: https://valyant.ai/

Connect with Rob on LinkedIn here: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rob-carpenter/ 

Thanks for a great chat, Rob!

Transcript powered by Happy Scribe

Hey there. Welcome to the DiscoPosse Podcast, and this is one of those fun ones because you actually get to hear the really fun technical snafu that happens right in the middle. But it doesn’t cut into the conversation, which is one you’re going to enjoy from Rob Carpenter. He’s the founder and CEO of Valyant AI, which is something that’s really, really cool because he talks about the idea of AI as a digital employee. This is especially being used in the area of conversational AI in fast food ordering.

So really, really cool. In fact, I bet you’ve already used one and you don’t even know it. And speaking of conversation, you want to have a great conversation. Let’s talk about data protection. I know it seems an exciting some days, but you know why it’s unexciting because you need to make sure that you’ve got Veeam to protect your assets. And that means everything from your On-premises world to your Cloud to your digitally native experiences that you’re running in Microsoft Teams, Office 365 and there’s many more neat things that are coming, so hang on tight.

You’ll see lots of good stuff. But let’s save the conversation because no one wants to have that Monday morning conversation. What app to the app? It went away this weekend and we can’t get it back. That won’t be a problem if you use Veeam, so go to vee.am/DiscoPosse. They are the leader in data protection and real true anywhere, always on availability for your application. So get it done. Go to vee.am/DiscoPosse. See what it’s all about. Speaking of protection, remember that as you’re moving around and you’re on the road, or even if you’re just trying to protect your identity and protect your data in transit, the best thing you do is use a VPN.

I know I use one, especially for not just day to day stuff, but being able to make sure I can do testing against my services from different parts of the world to see what the behavior is and what latency is. So whether you’re an application tester or whether you just want to make sure that you keep your identity safe, you can use ExpressVPN. I’m a fan of the team and love the product. So the easy way to do this, go to tryexpressvpn.com/DiscoPosse.

I make it really super easy by just naming it after me, but go check it out. And one of the places you should make sure you do it. Don’t go to coffee shops, get your own coffee, go to diabolicalcoffee.com and while you’re doing that, strap in. This is Rob Carpenter, the founder and CEO of Valyant.AI, and this is an absolute must listen. He’s a fantastic human. We talk about EO, we talk about Valyant, and we talk about a lot of things. Enjoy.

Perfect. My name is Rob Carpenter, the founder and CEO of Valyant AI. And you are listening to the DiscoPosse podcast.

Alright, I feel like I should have, for this one, I should have your platform introduce us, Rob. Because first of all, I’ve listened to a lot of content, so I am excited by what we’re about to discuss. This is something that’s near and dear to a space of study that I’ve been in and looking more around the business side of it and the idea of conversational AI, I’ve been lucky enough to have a lot of great folks on the show who are in the space and it’s just so exciting.

It brings interesting emotions when we talk about the advantages and what the potential displacements are. So there’s a lot of really good stuff that I’m going to love hearing from you, in your real first world and first person view of it. So before we get going, Rob, if you want to give yourself an intro for people that are new to you.

Yeah, thank you. I appreciate it. So just new to me. I’m originally from Alaska, so I grew up right on the Bering Sea at the top of the Aleutian chain. Probably one of the more random background you’ll hear out of somebody.

That’s a first. That’s a first. Definitely a win.

And we literally have like grizzly bears roaming around in our backyard and we could go out and fish from the bank and catch 20, 30, 40 pound king salmon. So this is a very interesting life, but very early on, I really had a big interest towards entrepreneurship and starting businesses. I just kind of looked at the people that are living the life that I want to live, other than astronauts, what do they do? And almost every one of them were entrepreneurs, people who had built and founded companies.

So I read Rich Dad, Poor Dad and started to kind of get an idea of how a different part of society work that I didn’t fully understand and ended up getting an undergrad degree in entrepreneurship. Ended up in 2010 out in Denver, Colorado, got an MBA with a specialization in enterprise technology management, founded a mobile application development company, did my first M&A transaction ever. Acquiring a company in India took a year and we literally run into problems because we are using the wrong type of ink on our paperwork.

So there’s a tremendous opportunity, grew that company to seven figures in revenue. But like anybody listening to this podcast, I mean, service based businesses are just really hard. You are constantly out hunting and killing, and you’re only as good as your current project portfolio that you have. And it was exhausting. And so when I ultimately came up with the idea for Valyant AI, I was just really excited to transition into a product based business. And so I’ve been running this company now for five years is making that transition.

Wow. And this is a great place to start, Rob, because by the time you can say what you’re doing. You have to have been doing it for a while when you’re in the product world, especially one that’s in the area of AI, and you’ve chosen your specific, targeted customer niche, which is the right thing to do, because too many people, you can get big eyes at the buffet, as they say. It’s very easy to think of too many use cases. But five years in now, when was kind of the first time you felt like you could really go to the world and say, we’re here?

Like this is something that takes a while to develop to even get to that MVP kind of customer ready environment, right?

I mean, you talk to anybody that’s in the conversational AI space, and there’s a little bit of puffy in your chest for a few minutes. Then there’s a little bit of actual bonding, and within 20 minutes, you’re in a therapy session. It’s amazing how quickly you end up in that space. It’s hard. And I think we’ve been at it, like I said, for five years, we’ve seen a lot of companies come and go. We’ve had our own serious kind of soul searching. Do we need to look after another industry?

And I think conversational AI and maybe to some degree, AI in general is just so hard because you can do proof of concepts or really simple demo fairly quickly. I mean, literally, in a weekend, you could put a demo together. But then when you actually try to bring a product to market, it is just crushingly and painfully hard to get to a true, fully functional, especially for what we’re trying to do. We’re trying to emulate an employee. I mean, it’s hard enough to get Google Home to understand my wife when she asks for a music request.

Let alone something that as capable as a human. When did I think we were going to be there? I mean, at any point you ask me, I’m like we’re three months away. We are so close. Just another three months and then another three months and then another three months and a painful statement that has always stuck out in my mind. It was either the CTO or the CEO of SoundHound said, it takes three years to realize you’re ten years away.

And so I desperately hope we’re not ten years away now we are in market. We have a product. We are automating orders today, but like anybody in the AI space, we do have human in the loop backup support. And so the question really is, how fast can we reduce the reliance on those humans in the loop and get to a point where it’s just pure AI without any outside support?

This is the real interesting thing. And when we talk about what it is that you’re doing, it’s an experience that will be viscerally understood by people because they’re going to know what it’s like being on the other side of that little box. So Rob if you want. Let’s give a bit of a walk through of what Valyant is doing and where your first customer use cases are.

Yeah. So when we initially came up with the idea for what became Valyant and kind of early on, knew we wanted to pick one industry. I mean, it’s good conventional wisdom. Pick up each head, own it, and then strike out into other industries from a place of strength. And so I sat down. I kind of came up with my own rubric of ten to 15 categories and then identified roughly 20 different industries. We were at that time a future solution in search of a problem. So it’s like, where could this technology be applied?

And so we ultimately settled on the restaurant industry. Now there are some cons to the restaurant industry that people are familiar with in terms of low margin, a lot of price pressure, things like that with things like point of sale systems, there’s a lot of pressure and commoditization. So there are some challenges to the restaurant industry. But relative to some other big market verticals, like take retail. For example, the nice thing about restaurants is you tend to have a more limited domain set, especially as you look at quick serve restaurants or fast food.

You might have 75 to 150 different menu items, a couple of permutations on there, and then maybe a few hundred other key terms, catchup, fork napkin, things like that. But if it’s a very limited domain set. And although I don’t always agree with everything, Kai-Fu Lee says, if you read this book, AI Superpowers. He talks a lot about the importance of kind of a vertical integration approach, at least in these early stages of AI. And I do fully agree with that. And so we decided that restaurant was really where we’re going to make our mark.

And so we’ve pretty much been super focused on it in five years. And we’ve turned a lot of companies way and a lot of other verticals. And we’ve just tried to stay hyper, hyper focused on this one key space. And then for us, specifically, what we look at, where we see the most demand from the market is around drive-thru automation. So there was interest prior to COVID, but over the year and a half of the kind of first round of COVID drive through became one of the most important areas inside of the entire US restaurant industry.

And you’re talking to $865,000,000,000 per year market. A lot of the quick of restaurants we talked to, they were up 30% year over year. So you look at how painful it’s been for sit down, you know, high-end, fast casual. Those restaurants all suffered under COVID, fast food boom. I mean, they did huge business, and 90% to 95% of that business was done through drive through. So it was just serendipitous place for us to be having three years of kind of wind in our back at the point that all this came about.

And I was on a call this morning with the restaurant operator, and they’re already seeing another big surge in terms of demand for drive through as we go into kind of the Delta variant of COVID. So we hyper focus on that one specific use case. We manufacture our own hardware. We stick it inside the restaurant. It hooks into the technology that the employees use for their headsets to talk to the customers in the drive through. We currently process everything in the cloud. The goal would be in a year to move towards edge computing so we can do everything on site, even when the Internet goes down.

And then we have our own proprietary speech to text engine, NLP engine. And then what I refer to as the natural language generator or just kind of more vaguely, just the logic engine. It’s kind of a common sense brains of the system. So we’ve developed all those systems in-house to specifically address this one use case.

There’s so much good stuff I could do an hour on each subset it to you. So first of all, just the fact that we refer to QSR. I love this quick serve restaurants because fast food is like a pejorative at this point because you just think of just negative connotation of food. But as an industry like you said, the address of a market is fantastically huge, especially now that people are moving to this idea. They want to get out of their house, but they don’t want to be sitting in a restaurant in a risk situation.

So it’s kind of a really good mix. But quick serve restaurants like you said, they they’ve got a specific target, and it’s a very repeatable thing. And the first thing that I think of and I know people are listening and thinking, isn’t this going to get rid of somebody wearing that headset? And that’s why I want you to allay those fears, because I know a lot of my own reasoning that I do not believe that. But first hand, you’re in this, that’s got to be, I’ll say, a common if not a top objection when you talk about the value of what you can do with Valyant.

You know, and for whatever it’s worth Interestingly, when we talk to end customers, employees, the brands, some of them bring it up. They’re generally not worried about it. It tends to be all of the media interviews, and it’s about 100% that it comes up. So I’m glad we’re addressing it right out of the gate, because it is a very important topic for us to touch base on. So specifically, what we’re talking about right now is labor repurposing. So the person that’s in that order taker position. And this was something that I learned along the way, 90% of all QSR restaurants across the country that order taker is also doing sometimes three or four additional jobs to order taking.

So it’s not a dedicated position. So really, what we’re doing is we are automating a task, and that task may take that order taker 50% of their time, but they still have to process payment. They still need to fill up soft drinks. They still need to clean up after spills. They’re being pulled in multiple different directions simultaneously. We talked to one at a top seven QSR brand and their order taker on averages, doing five jobs. And so the critical thing for them is like we just need to automate this task because that person’s life is really hard.

Turnover is really high, and there are only certain subsets of their employees that they can even put into that position. So it’s a really critical challenge for them to figure out how to backstop all those employees and just make their lives better. That, I think is a kind of microeconomic view of the situation. If you also step back and look macroeconomically at the service and specifically restaurant industry, there’s 1.4 million unfilled positions in the United States today. So even if we were taking a whole position, which were not just task automation, there’s still not even the people to do those jobs.

I mean, you go anywhere and you’re going to see help on these times on pretty much every single business. Look at the airline industry, especially as our economy that starts to recover over the summer. It was a nightmare. I mean, look at Spirit Airlines, right? I mean, those guys practically went bankrupt because they had to cancel, like, three weeks worth of flights because they just literally didn’t have people to work. Alaska Airlines, they’re near and dear to my heart, they were forcing executives in Seattle to go out and do baggage handling work on the Tarmac executive.

You’re talking of VPs of marketing or chief operating officers hauling luggage because the labor shortage was so acute for them. So we’re really helping these restaurants because they cannot find the labor and on average, within the industry turnovers 150% to 300% per year. So you have a really hard time finding somebody. When you can find someone, you’re refilling that position one to three times per year. And if they do stick, that person’s being asked to handle five different jobs simultaneously. And that is a perfect application of AI or, more generally, probiotics.

When you don’t have enough people to go around, the job is monotonous. It’s dangerous. It’s boring. Automate it. Let humans focus on the things they’re better at than doing something that is just a repetitive task over and over and over again. How’s that?

That’s perfect. Number one, you’ve affirmed my belief in that we are not removing roles were, in fact, elevating people into more opportune roles. And I love that such perfect examples. And thank you for bringing numbers to it as well. We can see the impact there. It’s frightening, right? People think of this idea that we’re like, of course, last night, as we’re recording this, the news hit that we’re creating the Tesla Bots. And so immediately there’s this, somehow that Elon is looking to get rid of the citizens of Earth and replace them all with robots.

And it’s, like you said, it’s such a media frenzy reaction, just because it’s something to talk about that they know can trigger someone to listen. And I guess when you’re in that business, that is your that’s your business is getting people to listen, getting people to read. And these kind of tropes are so easy to latch onto. But like you said, when it comes down to it, the people who you’re talking to that are going to use these systems in their own environment that they’re working in, they’re like, thank you, Rob. Bring it on.

Yeah. And I think, too. I mean, we got to get a little more nuanced with things as well, because the innovation has always been part of human society. It’s woven into the fabric of the American psyche. What we need to be concerned about, which is why I think this question is important, and we should talk about it is the pace of innovation. If we look and we step back and we say 100 years ago, turn to the last century, something like 95% percent of the entire US Labor Force was involved in the agrarian industry.

And I don’t know about you, but I really love going into my office and sitting at my quiet desk with a warm cup of coffee or playing Ping pong with my team or grabbing a beer for a happy hour versus being out and working with livestock or out picking vegetables. Not that there’s anything wrong with those types of jobs, and that’s obviously critical to our survival as a species. But if you look at where we are today, it’s something like 1.3 or 1.4% of the entire US Labor Force is still involved in the agrarian industry.

So we have more food than we’ve ever produced in the history of human civilization. And we went from 95% of people involved in that to one and a half percent. That is innovation. Innovation is not bad. That has made a lot of people’s lives a lot better. I think, where we have to get concerned. And I think this was maybe a bigger fear five years ago. But it’s just the pace of innovation too quick, because there’s a natural attrition of jobs every year and the creation of new jobs, like, 20 years ago, who would have thought social media manager would be such a critical position and how it is. So like that’s innovation.

If the pace of innovation is too fast, that’s when it creates problems, because then you’re losing too much of the workforce before you can replace it with new jobs. And I think that big fear does come down to some element of conversational. Ai, automating, service based work and white collar jobs. And then I think the other big part of it was everything going on with self driving cars, for example, like truck driving. That’s the number one profession in 26 States in the United States. So if all that gets automated and then all customer service work gets automated, that’s a big problem.

But going back to the Tesla Bot and what we’ve seen over the last five years in these kind of AI updates of where self driving, we’re still not even at level four. So things that we thought would be easy. Elon Musk was promising we would have it in 2017, still aren’t even really ready in much of a real way for a beta consumption. And so I think that’s maybe alleviated some of those concerns. Are these things coming? Yeah, absolutely. Will there be self driving cars in the decade? We thought it out.

But by stretching out the timeline for innovation, I’m actually significantly less concerned now because, yes, jobs will be destroyed. But the new jobs are going to be created while we wait for things like self driving car to hit level five and actually be able to work in a place like Alaska where there’s snow everywhere and there’s nothing really tangible for the cameras and the light are to really play off of. So we’ll get there. It’s going to stretch out a lot more than we thought it would five years ago.

And that’s going to give us plenty of time, I think, to replace those jobs with new jobs.

And in a way, you bring an interesting point, I think, isn’t the fact that we talk about the potential innovation. It becomes an antibody to the removal of value of the current human counterparts that are doing the stuff, the fact that we have these discussions and we talk about the potential to reach the specific areas that we’re aiming for, that we’re not there yet. It gives the industry and humans a chance to kind of go, if this is coming, we better start to innovate processes and companies.

And the way that we work like, I’ve never known anybody that automated themselves out of a job. They’ve automated themselves into a better opportunity almost every time. There are, very certainly, some specific roles that, like mechanical robotic process automation. That type of stuff did replace some things. But again, if we looked at the numbers, it’s such a small portion of the global industry and the ones that it is. In fact, it was literally killing people to do this work.

Right.

This is stuff that shouldn’t have been done by humans. We just had no choice because we weren’t born with the machines. So that’s an interesting thing.

I think the perfect case study for this is right at 100 years old. And that was Henry Ford and the Model T. And he was one of the very first kind of industrialists to bring in this idea of automation and mass manufacturing. And when you have one manufacturing line and you start to automate 20% or 30% of that mass manufacturing line. People get scared. And he had employees. He had family members. He had people from the community that were literally picketing outside of his factories because automation was destroying jobs.

This is 100 years old. And what happened is that by automating things, he was able to bring down the price of the Model T so that more people could afford it. So then what happened? More people bought it. So he opened a second line and a third and a fourth and a fifth and a sixth. And before you know it, you’re employing exponentially more people than you ever employed before. And you’re doing it because you’re becoming more efficient with your use of capital. And that’s exactly what’s going to happen here.

But that doesn’t mean there’s still not concerned in the short term, just like there was 100 years ago when people were picketing out in front of this manufacturing facilities.

The other thing as well is the acceptance of the new innovation becomes a baseline pretty easily the point leading up to it seems like a forever moment. Like my example, actually, I used this in a presentation recently at work, and I said, like, you know, Elon went to first principles when it came to space travel. And we said, like this, everybody told him it couldn’t be done. It’d be silly to do it, just even in that specific one area. He then said, I’m going to land the rocket, not just going to send it up.

I’m going to land it on a launch pad. And they said, this is crazy. It can’t be done. And then one step further, he does it repeatedly. And now Jeff Bezos goes to the edge of space, and he lands the Blue Origin rocket nose up. And not a single person said anything about it, right?

They were just like, yeah, that can be done now.

Yeah. Like, it was like, if it hadn’t landed that way, people have been like, whatever dude. They would have been angry at him. And so it allowed us to move the conversation to something new, which was okay now that we can do this repeatedly, what can we do with this availability of technology? And now this is. And there’s an interesting thing as well. People said, well, we’re lining in the pockets of Elon as an example. And look, I’m not going to go. I don’t want to have a discussion of the weight of the billionaire or whatever the challenge there.

The result of the work that they’ve done has resulted in the US government saving a $150,000,000,000 in spending while still sending objects to the ISS now. So then it has had a significant benefit to the entire, every citizen of the United States has benefited as a result of that. So it’s definitely there.

And this is going to be a whole new world for innovation, right? I don’t really even think it’s a question of if anymore, within a few years, the SpaceX, Heavy Falcon Rockets, they’re going to be landing people on the moon. They’re going to be landing people on Mars. And by doing that, you’re going to need habitation, you’re going to need food, you’re going to need water, you’re going to need rocket propellant, and SpaceX will do some portion of those. And the companies that come behind them will do some portion of those.

But they’re not going to do all of them. They probably won’t do more than a few fractions of single digits of everything that has to be done. And so it literally opens up entire new worlds from an innovation standpoint, from a work standpoint, from an economic opportunity standpoint. And so, hey, are they automating parts of a rocket manufacturing process that used to be manual? Yeah. Is that reducing a few jobs that used to be there? Yeah, for sure. But they are now producing dozens and eventually hundreds more Rockets that could have ever been done before.

And through that process, opening up a whole new world of economic activity. Absolutely. That goes back to that kind of more macro economic view that economies are dynamic. You were meant to automate stuff. That’s been part of civilization since we invented the wheel that allowed us to do things faster and more efficiently, and that will continue to be part of our future.

So looking at, I apologize, my video is suddenly decided. Speaking of the amazing thing of technology, and yet somehow a simple laptop can’t keep up with humans and what.

I’ve been there. I get it.

What I love about what you and the team are doing, Rob is again, very quickly jumping to the human value and impact that you can have with what you can do. So conversational AI has had its really, really interesting adoption in a lot of different areas, and some people didn’t even realize like it starts mostly in text. But the voice conversational AI, where have you seen the challenges and the real wins in bringing this product to market?

Yeah, I think the core of the challenges I’ve kind of learned the space over the last almost half decade now is sort of the daisy chain effect. Conversational AI has multiple critical path things that all have to happen in a row. And if any one single element in that process has degradation, then everything after it is degraded. So let’s say just using kind of easy numbers here, you have five critical processes within a conversational AI system. If every one of those systems is just degraded by 5%, take speech to text.

If you have a speech to text engine that was 95% accurate, you were talking about a world class product at that point, but you still have 5% degradation from a 100. If you have four things after that for a total of five and each one is accurate, you’re still talking about an end result that’s wrong 25% of the time. So you have to have every single one of these elements operating at 98, 99. 99 and a half percent accurate so that you can achieve something like 90% total success of orders, in our case, over the course of the entire interaction.

And so that’s the extremely hard problem. None of it can be just good or good enough. Literally, every one of your core elements basically has to be world class or close to world class to get to a point where you are automating the vast majority of the orders that flow through a system. So I think in a nutshell, is the hardest part of building a conversational AI platform.

Yeah. And this is the challenge. Like you said, the demos are easy to spin up when it goes well, it’s easy to get to a very simple MVP, but I’ll go back if anybody’s watch Silicon Valley sort of a famous thing, and it comes up with this visual. We can take pictures of food, and I can show you what the food is. And he takes a picture of the hotdog, and it says ‘hotdog’, and they’re like, yeah, we did it. And then the next one is not hotdog.

So if it works, it works well. But then very quickly the edge cases become core use cases, especially in conversation, because it’s such a nuanced thing to do with.

Yeah, the entire product is edge cases. There really is no happy path in these types of environments where we’ve seen the most customer facing conversational AI adoption is when it’s really like limited term or just one meaning you ask Alexa a question and it answers and you’re done. And for those guys, they’re effective on kind of world classes. They can do one round of context follow up. Our average interaction with the customer has a minimum of ten, and we can have some that are 20 or 30 in terms of asking, answer, asking and carrying on a more true type of conversation of what you would expect from an employee.

And so you have to carry the context through from all of that. You have to carry the nuance through from every one of those. Every single time you request a new response from the customer, you are opening yourself up to an edge case because they might say something like “nah”. You and I, we understand “nah”, that means no. But let’s say simultaneously the customer said that kind of quiet or their car radio is on or like we had last week, there was a leaf blower in the background.

And suddenly when speech to text treads to transcribe ‘nah’ that comes back as ‘yeah’. So you have in one moment completely inverted what the customer said and you might be 15 turns into a conversation. And the AI is an 100% accurate. You missed one small word. And now suddenly you may have failed the entire interaction of that conversation and taking the conversation off of a cliff, basically. So it’s an entire business of edge cases and the cliffs surrounding the start and end of the conversation are steep and painful if you don’t get what the customer is saying perfectly.

You brought up a really great point and we talked about the nuance. Even we say, we all speak English, everybody I should say. Even that just the fact the arrogance that I would automatically go to we all speak English. What the challenges is the we’ve got sort of dialect. We’ve got accents, nuances of the human language to then add it to the fact that you’re ordering things that are called like, can I get a double Foogly Moogly? This is not even easy stuff to be able to translate, right?

No. And that’s still on the speech to text side. I mean, there’s other things like, can I have the two for four? It’s like, okay, well, what’s the logic that goes into that? Is there two chili dogs count for that? Is the two the price or the quantity? Is four the price or the quantity? And so there’s innumerable number of amalgamation of how these restaurants will package their food and their condos together and allowing the system to intelligently understand the core basis or principles, rules in every one of those situations.

And then in something like, can I have the two for four? Basically, each of those words in there are super critical. And so if you just miss one word or mistranscribe it, it can wildly change the output of what the customer was actually intending to say to you.

And just even, such a great example is it two four four? Or two for four? Like, there are so many words sets, which I even find that I’ve tried to use speech-to-text with simple dictation. And it just creates this giant run-on sentences. And I often thought there’s got to be some way, some shortcut that can be used to say period, comma.

But when you say them, it writes out the word and you can see. And then what happens is the frustration drives me to feel that the tech is failing, which I know it’s an unfortunate human reaction, but it’s actually, I just haven’t figured out how to best interact with it.

Right. We are seeing I will say that element getting better. I think this job and building this company would have been so much harder, bordering on impossible technology aside, a decade ago, purely from a customer psychology standpoint, that was right around the time that we started seeing Siri, Alexa, and Google Home start to enter into the marketplace. Fast forward today, and there’s hundreds of millions of these units sold. And so everybody in one capacity or another has interacted with one of these systems or likely heard somebody else interacting with one of these systems.

And that is helping to start to kind of train customers a little bit more like in normal communication. We’re extremely fast. We tend to be a lot more vague. There tends to be a lot of nuance. It tends to be a lot of emotion and internal Ty and body language that all feed into our communication with each other. And I think people, as they’ve now gotten more and more used to interacting with these systems, they tend to be a little bit more halting, tend to be a little bit more direct, and ideally, if they can be a little bit louder and a little bit more patient, every one of those systems helps the accuracy of the system in terms of understanding customers.

Such a good point. And so this is a funny story based on that. The platform that I’m recording on, it’s called SignalWire. I actually had Sean Heiney, who is their chief product officer on this. Sean was great. And I started using the platform. One of the advantages is that it allows you to actually stream multiple sources of audio simultaneously, actually multiplexing audio.

The advantage to it is if you have four people on or if you and I talk over each other, we can talk over each other and it continues versus the, I’ll say, other platforms have the problem of digital cut off where as soon as one person starts to talk and then you and then they both start talking again. So this platform gets rid of that. However, when it starts to happen, we naturally accounts for it, like the people I talked to will stop talking if they hear me talk at the same time. I’m like, no, no, no. I was just sort of adding color to it like.

We can all talk at the same time. It’s actually fine.

We’ve learned to behave within systems that are common now. And like you said, no one really doubts. Hey, Siri, do this thing or hey, Google, do a thing. We’ve actually kind of, we’ve normalized it, which is kind of nice.

Yes, I would agree.

Now, on the technology side, you’ve talked, and if you don’t mind, I’d love to dive in. You talked about currently, of course, you’re sending data to the Cloud. That’s the easiest way to do this because you want to make sure is it the most computing powers there create the most viable centralization. It’s a great platform approach. But you talked about the move eventually to do more stuff at the edge. And that is important because we’re going to see more. You know, first of all, just the risk of power loss and data loss and other things could impact it.

But then you really open the doors to interesting, unique use cases once you can have a real full edge presence.

Yeah, it’s really critical. And we’re finding, at least within our industry, there’s definitely a lot of concerns from these restaurants. Some are in major Metropolitan areas and have fantastic high speed Internet, and a lot are in really rural areas with really bad Internet connections and even where we are now almost ready to go into 2022. There’s still restaurants in some cases, I know that are on dialog, and so in those situations, it really precludes you from being able to your product to market if you don’t have it capable on the edge.

So where we’re at right now is we just are starting in the more Metropolitan, more well connected areas, but it opens up basically the entire rest of the industry. If you can push it to the edge and you wait until the middle of the night and you push downloads and updates to the system and things like that to keep it current. And it’s a lot more from a kind of a device. It software management when you’re so distributed like that on the edge versus just having one core platform that’s in the cloud, that’s significantly easier to interact with and to modify, but at least for us and for our industry in our use case, that edge capability is going to be really critical for us in the future.

The other thing that’s interesting is as a founder and knowing that you’ve got to stay focused, how did you maintain that? You talked about, at the start, that you’ve actually had to actively turn away folks that have brought lots of hats? Rob, you’re doing this. What if you just did here? How do you maintain that real Pragmatic approach, especially not just because of you, but your entire team has to ultimately stay aligned on that vision of what you need to get done first before you branch out.

Yeah. I mean, I’d be lying if I said it wasn’t hard, and I think this is a problem that every entrepreneur and business owner faces and kind of determining their model, which is, are we going to have one sort of generic system that’s going to work well or work okay in a lot of different industries? Or do we just want to have an absolutely best in class product, but in the foreseeable future, it’s just hyper focused on one space. And I’m not actually a engineer. So I definitely come more from a business development operations type of background, and it’s hard to turn away a 500 billion dollar company that wants to talk to you about voice AI capabilities.

Generally, what I’ve done, which has been helpful for me, is I just throw out high barriers to entry for them, because for these big companies, it takes nothing to waste a startup time. This could be interesting. Let’s see if all those guys over there want to go and work on this for free or, nearly free for six months or a year, and then we’ll see if we want to do anything with it. So it’s been a bit of a self fulfilling prophecy to stay focused, because I have taken those meetings.

I have talked to those companies, but then generally, I just throw out high price points to them. And then in the back of my mind, I’m like, okay, well, if they pay this, then I can go higher. One, two, three people. They can focus on adapting our platform because at the end of the day, it’s just software, right? So it can be adapted to any industry. But it takes focused time and energy and concentration. And in pretty much every one of those situations, then the companies come back and said, like, okay, well, it’s not that big of a priority for now, and it works out in that way.

And it’s a way where we’re not rejecting them or leaving a bad feeling with them. We just kind of lay out the case, the background, the reason it goes into it and then throw a big figure in front of them and say, hey, if you pay this, we’ll do it. And I think especially right now within the conversational AI space. There’s so many people working on it. There’s so much going on. I think there’s a lot of excitement. There’s a lot of real technology, there’s a lot of hype, there’s a lot of smoke and mirrors.

And so it’s very choppy waters for companies to figure out how they want to navigate this process. And so by throwing that barrier up, it’s pretty much kind of kept everybody out and allowed us to just stay on our sort of happy path from a go to market strategy. That’s just how it made sense for me.

Yeah, it’s great. And when you talk about that, there’s a lot of folks that are talking about the space, and they have technologies versus like yourself, where you’ve literally chosen, you’ve laser focused on a use case, you’re delivering it, you’re growing with Lighthouse customers. You’re doing that really, really strong methods of don’t do B until you’ve succeeded at A versus people that are like talking about A, B and C, and then maybe dabble in D. But they can create a lot of noise for you.

I don’t want to call it competition, but how do you do noise reduction against that stuff? Because eventually your customers will be like, hey, Rob, some other people are approaching us because of course, you go to Google and you look up Valyant. And the first thing that comes up is not Valyant because somebody’s buying ad space above you, which is the first site you’re doing well is when people are buying ad space above you. So Congratulations on that.

Yeah. I’ll tell you what, ironically, we’re in a situation right now where customers are not a problem for us. So it’s nice if we just really don’t have to focus much energy there basically everybody in the market want this technology. And so I think we’ve done a nice job of sort of positioning ourselves out there. And so as I look at the top ten biggest brands in the entire United States, we’re talking to or working with half of them. And so these large organizations or finding their way to us.

And that’s been really helpful, too, because then I’m not trying to work my way up through cold calls or introductions or other marketing efforts and having to kind of work my way up the chain to somebody important that can actually make the decision and sign off on projects and determined to move forward. So I think that portion of it has been extremely healthy for us, but I might need to go look and see who’s bidding against us and put some energy in it.

The other thing is just as a technology side, it’s very easy to look at the wonder of what’s possible. And as you go and you take on like adding new features or adding new customers, and you’ll see the expansion into potential, like taking on this idea of moving more tech to the edge. It’s a real undertaking where you have to invest into it. So when you’re making decisions like that as a founder, what’s your thought process around, where you have to be 100% revenue generating versus how much can I put into the longer term growth and viability?

Yeah, I think, and I’m assuming here a little bit, but I don’t think there’s too many of us that are in this hardcore AI space that are really trying to bust new pathways into markets that have never existed that are hyper profitable because it’s just huge amounts of work and huge amounts of investment into the technology. And you have some level of just sort of carrying costs for every single customer. And so the more you can improve the platform, the more you can bring down those costs and improve your unit economics.

And so something like Edge, your hardware, those are decisions I think bigger decisions are. For how long should I keep trying to drive towards perfection versus focusing more on just trying to be profitable on a per unit basis? And I think at least from my perspective, I really view conversational AI as a true kind of customer service automation capability across dozens or hundreds of markets as a blue sky opportunity. So I would rather keep investing like crazy to get the product as capable as possible and then be able to push into as many additional spaces once we can transition out from a source of strength versus just trying to dig in on the unit economics and staying smaller and trying to make each one of those locations just a little bit more profitable.

So I think it’s a land grab right now. A lot of different companies have grab space in a lot of different industries. We have three to four, I think very real competitors that have good technology in our space that we’re actively competing with to try to grab land in this space. And I think we will continue to see this at minimum, for another five to ten years. And then I would expect conversational AI to start going through a similar type of market consolidation that you’ve seen in a lot of the other industries prior to this.

Yeah. And the interesting thing, of course, is because folks like you and I were a bit more aggressively focused on the the competitor space. And in the end, there’s such a huge consumer environment for this stuff. There really is. If you spend so much time focusing on the competitors, you get lost chasing them instead of chasing your business. And it’s so we always have to be mindful. But of course, the the inner nerd in me is always like, you know, where are we technologically aligned with somebody? And make sure I can always think about differentiation without being stuck on like, they changed their messaging again.

You can’t be attached to folks that are in a parallel space too much.

Yeah, I would agree. And I still think there’s some challenges and some education for the market as well. We recently ran into a situation where a company in our space was telling potential customers like, hey, we’re 90% plus accurate, and they’re just kind of leaving out that. But we have some people in the background that are fixing things on the fly to help us get to that number. And so the customer wasn’t quite as sophisticated enough to ask and the other company didn’t bring it up. And so there is still an element, I think of kind of smoke and mirrors out there.

This is a very unconsolidated, unstabilized market. It’s a bit of the wild wild west. There are no norms, there are no level systems to compare against. There are no independent third parties to verify capabilities and stuff like that. And so we see companies throwing out pretty stretched metrics relative to what we see, both in terms of what state of the art technology and when we test what’s their system actually capable of. And so that’s been kind of an interesting process of bringing this product to market and kind of navigating against the sales and marketing that maybe sometimes there’s somewhere between kind of disingenuous to just sort of withholding information because customer didn’t know what to ask.

Yeah, that’s a tough one. Like you said, especially when it’s a new technology and new space. No one knows that there’s a Mechanical Turk hiding behind the scenes and all that stuff.

Yeah. Google spends billions of dollars developing their Google home system. And I heard a number at one point that said they still have up to 30% of interactions being reviewed by a human. So it is the very dirty secret of the industry of which everybody that’s in it understands crystal clear, and those who don’t understand it and who are trying to figure it out and who are trying to find a way to take advantage of this technology. They often find maybe murky, kind of maybe feel like they were a little misled.

And so I think there needs to be a lot more transparency on our part. And as a technology group as we bring these technologies to market to be real clear about where things work and where things don’t work.

I don’t want to put a limit on the use cases that you’ve got because I’ll say it’s more focused and that you’re less likely to bump into the need to do real deep like sentiment analysis. There’s obviously points where that would come in. I would imagine.

Yeah. For certain.

When someone starts yelling into the speaker like Samuel L. Jackson, you’re probably, time to make sure that somebody taps the headset and get to listen to this like versus some of, like the call center AIs, they’re much more. I feel I’m about to say it, they’re much more challenging to implement because they’re specifically going after doing stuff like continuous sentiment analysis to gauge the health of the call because they’ve been a different long form conversation to attack.

So I don’t mean to say it’s harder. It’s a different challenge that they’re solving. Yours, where do you see the variability and what you can start to do with some of the deep capabilities in NLP and actual analysis?

Yeah. I mean, again, going back to, I mean. We are taking in live conversations on. The vast majority of the conversations we are taking are being handled entirely by the AI, and it took us a long time to get there, but that is a very real product with very real capability. I do believe what we’re doing is exponentially harder than something like sentiment analysis. That is extremely valuable to those companies credits. They’re probably making a lot more money than we are as we’re trying to grind out this hard space, but think about it with that sentiment analysis example.

If it doesn’t work correctly in one to ten cases, does anybody know? Does the end customer know that they care? Does the call center rep on the phone that they know that they really care? Maybe if the sentiment picks up, the call is going really bad, it goes to pull in a manager or they just use it to monitor it after the fact, but it doesn’t stop the core capability from happening. The customer and the call center up still did their call. Could it have been better?

Probably. They still did their call with what we’re doing and with what other companies in our space are doing. If we miss something, the whole call goes off the rails or theoretically can go off the rails if it’s not recoverable and it’s front and center with the customer. So it would be more accurate to say that the call center person is actually an AI trying to carry on a conversation with the customer. That’s much harder than just passively monitoring stuff and tagging it for data or analysis or flagging it to pull somebody in because it doesn’t fundamentally break the core product.

If it doesn’t work, if we go off of one of our edge cases, it fundamentally breaks the product.

Yeah, that’s the interesting thing. And anybody would go through this I just think of the last interaction they had with somebody through an order process at a quick serve restaurant. Odds are the last thing you did. We as humans, made a mistake doing the order or when they do the read, that’s why they do the read back. And I love it. It’s like, do you want to? Actually, no. Let me go with number two instead of number one. And then it’s like, okay, we’ll do that. Is there anything else we can help you with?

Okay. What I’ve got for you now is X and like, that rapid validation and the fact like, there’s so much that can go wrong in the seconds leading up to that, they’ll be like, actually I want number two, not number two, number three. I mean, yeah, number three. Just writing those words down. Yeah. Big deal. You transcribe it. That’s basically a glorified transcript. But actually taking that and turning it into an order.

And responding intelligently in that situation. And maybe you could parse all of that and you got what you needed. But maybe you have to parse all of that. And the customer was still ambiguous. We had a situation when we were working with the restaurant chain here in Denver called Good Times, where we were automating breakfast orders. And so we had a one customer I remember came up. He was like, hey, could I have six sausage burritos? No, no, wait.

Actually, I want three bacon burritos and then sausage burritos. And so it’s like, do you want nine burritos? Do you want six burritos? There’s a lot of ambiguity in there. And so then the system also has to have context. And so that’s an area where we see the company spending billions of dollars, and they’re just scratching the surface of context. Yet for any company that’s trying to do customer service automation, where they’re directly talking to a customer, you have to be able to manage a tremendous amount of ambiguity and related context and then try to respond as we talked about early on with the daisy chain issue perfectly every time.

And you might have a minimum ten turns back and forth, and all you need is just one of those to go wrong. And then the entire thing could be a failure. And so it’s a very painful and exacting process to get to a point where you have a product that is kind of widespread, adoptable and scalable within the industry.

It’s an amazing time to be in this world, though, that we can do this, right? Like to think of the technology that enabled you to do this and that you and the team have chosen to take it on and your succeeding. What a fantastic world, isn’t it?

I love it. I mean, not to be corny, but, I mean, I still get goose bumps when I review sessions, and it’s just perfect all the way through, because I know how hard and painful and grueling that work has been to get to that point. And so when I can sit down and listen to a minute, two minutes, two and a half minute order, and everything flows perfectly throughout the entire order. It’s like, oh, my God, it’s live. It’s real.

It took us a long time. This is a product. It’s such an exciting experience. And truly, I couldn’t be more excited to be in the AI space because this is ultimately going to be the brains of everything. Right? And I think I don’t see it as much as I would like, but there should be a lot more coupling, I think, between robotics companies than AI companies. And if we throw a sort of full circle here, back to the Tesla Bot, there’s maybe one or two Nobel Prizes that’ll be one by an engineering team that can actually pull off what Elon Musk talked about yesterday.

But let’s say that they do. It’s still an extremely capable system that is going to be a paperweight unless it has the brain of an AI behind it. It has to know to be able to carry on conversations with people around it. If it’s about to drop something on somebody and somebody says, stop and yells it at the robot and they’re in an echo-ey warehouse. It’s got to pick that up perfectly the first time and do exactly what was requested. And customers, as we found, just because they’re so ambiguous, they’re not going to write a script for a robot to go and get their mail or go buy them a gallon of milk.

Must talked about like, the system is going to have to be intelligent enough. Somebody’s going to say, Go get me milk. And the robot is going to have to intuitively know what go get me milk means, which is like, turn around, walk to the door, open the door, walk to probably a car, get into the car, drive to the grocery store, walk into the grocery store, go get the milk, pay for it, and then repeat all the steps to get back. And that is where AI lives.

And so it’s just such an exciting time. Industry wide. It’s just in its infancy. It’s going to be really fun to watch this technology evolve over the next 10 to 20 years as it just continues to get smarter, more sophisticated, and starts to proliferate into more places that ultimately, I think, will make our lives better, both as consumers and as employers and his coworkers.

And I want to tap into something that, as technology, amazing. Our place in the world to be able to do this is pretty fantastic. Yeah, I was going to say, what are the risks that we have? But I don’t want to take a dark turn. I want to tap into something else that I saw in your bio. You’re a member of Entrepreneurs Organization, so EO has come up a lot. I’ve had, when you do a couple of hundred of these interviews, you eventually bump into this common things. And EO comes up a lot.

I love to hear. Rob, how did you discover this? And what’s been the value that you found from being a part of that organization?

Yeah. So for anybody listening, who doesn’t know, EO stands for Entrepreneurs Organization. So it’s basically an international networking group organization where entrepreneurs come together. So here in Colorado, we’ve gotten extremely healthy chapter. I think we’re 160, maybe going on 200 people that are in our organization. And every single month, they’re putting on different events. So a couple of days ago, a guy that owns a brewery here in Denver, gave anybody who wanted to a tour of his brewery and gave everybody free beer and talked about the business and the economics of it, things like that.

There was a lady that owned a bunch of restaurants. She gave people tours of her restaurants, explained how they work. She had a very cool kind of collective thing going on where they renovated an old warehouse, and they had, like, a dozen of different restaurants inside there. And you go sit at any restaurant, you can get food from multiple restaurants. Talked about kind of where the evolution that she saw restaurants going. At one point, I think two years ago, we brought in a guy from the military who was the one that found Saddam Hussein.

And he talked about all the work that he had to do to be able to kind of track down where Saddam Hussein was. So it’s just fantastic and intellectually exciting to be around similar people that are trying to grow companies. It’s amazing how many times we all run into the same problems. So to be able to chat through those problems, share experiences of how you’ve overcame those issues, could be partners, can be fundraising, could be legal, can be challenging customers, because ultimately, at the end of the day, it is lonely at the top of an organization.

You don’t want to complain to your direct reports and bring them down. You need to kind of sometimes bottle some of that stuff up, and you just try to keep people kind of excited about the mission and the goals and pushing forward. But then you really do need people that you can lean on have similar experiences that have been what you’ve been through. So the tours, the networking, the speakers, like, those things are fun. But I think the core of EO is what’s referred to as forums.

And so within our bigger chapter of 160 to 200 people, it breaks it down. And everybody gets put into a forum of about five to sometimes ten people kind of on the bigger end of the spectrum. And you get together once a month. And then everybody talks about, like, hey, here’s what I got going on here’s. What’s working here’s, what’s not working. You can give each other experience shares. You can lean on each other. And then even within our forum, we’ll bring in speakers. And it could be speakers to give you education on business, life goals, they could help you with relationships, retirement planning, succession, things like that.

And so it creates this community of people that know what you’re going through that can help you. And that can support you, be it in business or be it in life. And then because it’s an international organization. If you travel to or pretty much any kind of major city, globally, there are chapters of other EO members there, and I’ll regularly get emails of, like, an entire forum that are flying out to Colorado, and they’re like, hey, if there’s anybody local that wants to meet up, let us know.

And you just get to meet all these cool people. I attended one with a group that came up from Costa Rica and really hit it off with a guy he owned a custom software development company. I had just recently left my custom software development company. We connected on everything. And by the end of the night and a bunch of beers, he gave me free access to use this place in Costa Rica whenever I wanted. And so it’s like, what are you going to get those types of experiences in your day to day life when you’re just kind of bumping into people?

And so it’s obviously something that’s near and dear to my heart as I was able to quickly pontificate on it. But I think for anybody that’s running a company, I would just highly encourage you to check it out. It’s just nice to be surrounded and able to interact with just really cool people.

I think I was calling goodness greater policy cameras, last time from Sheets & Giggles. He’s in Colorado, and he was the first one that turned me on to the organization. And then, like I said, probably half dozen other people now. Since then, he brought it up. I’m like, I got to get closer to this. And I’ve actually looked at the organization. It’s good because there’s, like, a minimum as far as the range of folks who can get involved, it’s very targeted. It’s not like a hangers on Reddit group.

This is people who are active. You have to have a certain amount of active revenue. You’re really and truly aligned with a community of people that are doing something. And it’s it’s just so refreshing to me to see that because there’s community for technology, there’s community for so many things. But for founders, it’s a really difficult and lonely spot to be sometimes and have that peer group accessible without having to engage advisors and ultimately, like, everyone wants to give you ideas because they know they can get a hunkier company.

That’s ultimately what a lot of the people that. I want advice from people that are living the life not who just want a taste of mine.

Right. And that is exactly what it is. And I think you also hit on something that was kind of important to me, too. Is it’s not the hanger honors because I went to two or three of the other big kind of national global sort of groups kind of like this, and they just tend to be stuffed with consultants and people that kind of want to live in your orbit. Again, as I go back to my forum, everybody’s roughly in a range from a revenue standpoint, there’s just one guy that’s in the hundreds of millions from a revenue standpoint.

Everybody’s got similar sized organizations in terms of the number of people that they have. And because we’re all living it, we can all collaborate. So in my custom software development company, I crashed and burned with my partners and they bailed out of the company. I’d say at least half of the people that are in my forum, my group of about nine people. Well, probably half of them have had partnership issues since I’ve been in the group, and that’s a lot of experience that I can share.

One guy mentioned that’s in the hundreds of millions from a revenue standpoint, he’s able to give a tremendous amount of advice to us that aren’t at that stage yet that are still growing and building our companies because he’s done a lot of the things that we’ve done. We even have one guy in there that’s managing partner of one of the law firms, and he very kindly, you know, we’ll answer questions and give us some at least sort of direction of where to go from a legal standpoint and things like that.

And so it’s so helpful. And a lot of us will find, we’ll start forum and we’ll just kind of feel like heavy and it’s difficult. And by the time I’m done and we all go get dinner together after forum, I just feel like light and happy and just kind of rejuvenated again. So it’s just sort of good for my soul anyway, to just be around really interesting and exciting people doing cool things. Yeah.

Because like you said, when you go to meet ups and just like general, like event driven organizations, you tend to get a lot of people who are like they’re entrepreneurs. I’m not saying that one isn’t right or one is better or whatever. But you don’t want to be in a group where you’re surrounded by people who just run Shopify. So I know as a guy who runs some Shopify store, I got a successful coffee business, but I don’t have the same thing to bring to the group versus my experience and the advisory and real side.

So yeah, you can see the cut line where.

Plus those meetup groups, they are wonderful. They tend to be a lot more superficial. Might be the best way to put it. You don’t get really deep from a connection standpoint. You might share some ideas here about some cool companies. People come, people go. There’s a lot of transients to it. For our forum, we’ve got real strict requirements on attendance because we really believe that time together, sort of build bonds and build connections. In October, my forum and all of our spouses. We’re all flying to Napa Valley together. We rented a house together.

We’re lining up different wineries that we’re going to go to different restaurants. We’re going to go to in two weeks. We’re all going to meet up at a Lake out here in Colorado, and we’re going to bring our families and our kids. And so it’s a lot, I think, more consistent and much deeper ties than what you might see in some of those other organizations. Yeah.

And it’s finding the group of people who are aligned in a like, it’s tough to find those two things together. You can find a lot of alignment. But then if they’re so disparate in where they are company position wise, it sounds like such a great organization. I’ve heard nothing but really respectful words spoken and folks that are part of it. So I do recommend that. I guess in closing, sadly we lost couple of minutes in the middle because, for anybody that still watching on the YouTube, they’ll see that I’m on a phone instead of on my regular rig here.

Rob, I’d love to get your advice for folks that are getting started, and especially now, COVID and the state of the world means we’re going to be remote longer. It’s a great opportunity, I believe. Are there opportunities to be had? And so for folks that maybe were on the cusp, people that are already remote and thinking, maybe this is my time to start up my entrepreneur mindset. What advice do you have? Kind of today. It’s August of 21. What can the next three months be for somebody who wants to think big?

Yeah. So if you already have your business idea and you know what you want to do, then just get started. It’s the most critical thing. I just finished reading a book called Super Founders, and they talked about what was the number one key to people’s success. And the kind of read it too long didn’t read is past success, which sounds cheesy, but it actually makes sense. So people that have started companies are then more likely to be more successful and are more likely to build a billion dollar companies having done it in the past.

So I think it’s just like anything. You need experience and you need time. I think a lot of aspiring entrepreneurs, they try to make their first company a billion dollar company. So goal one is just our, goal two might be go easy on yourself. Don’t think you have to build the next Uber or next Microsoft with your first company. Think of it in terms of training for a marathon. And your billion dollar company is running to the marathon, right? You need to do things leading up to that.

The easiest place to start a new business is a service based company. There are so many opportunities in this country right now. It’s astounding I think of anything, it doesn’t have to be super exciting. I mean, it could literally be a landscaping company. It could be a house cleaning company. It could be a painting company. People out there are desperate for services. As a quick example, my wife and I are going to remodel our basement. We’re adding a bedroom and a bathroom when we initially got it quoted about 18 months ago to now, not only have prices gone up, about 220%, we had to bring out, like 15 contractors to just find one contractor that wanted to take the project on.

And so there’s huge opportunities out there for people to just start really good service based businesses. Not only I think is there sort of a lot of opportunity from a work standpoint. I think a lot of people out there think that it has to be this big, grandiose thing and it really does not. So start a service based company, get good at it, deliver great customer service. Build a business number one, potentially get yourself out of the rat race. You’re able to create a job for yourself.

You’re able to create income for yourself. Maybe you’re able to then have an exit and sell the business and you use that capital to start your billion dollar company. Or kind of more like I did. I got the service based company to a good place. And then I came up with the idea for my billion dollar product based company. I hired somebody to run my service based company for me. And then I went full time on the product based company. So you open up a tremendous amount of freedom for yourself.

If you just are owning a business and just running a business, just start. Go easy on yourself. Consider service first and focus on coming up with your billion dollar idea while you’re already working for yourself and making money.

That doesn’t inspire people to just sort of take a breath and think about what the possibilities are. I don’t know what is. So, Rob, thank you very much. It’s been a real pleasure. Thank you for writing me out during my technical troubles here today. If people did want to get connected online or elsewhere, what’s the best way they can do so?

Yeah. Feel free to just shoot me an email. It’s rob@valyant.ai or find us online or any of our social media sites.

That’s a beauty. Excellent. Rob. Thank you very much. Lots of great lessons. I’m bullish on the possibility for Valyant. I like what you’re doing. And as they say in the world, you bet on three things the three Ts, team, TAM, and technology. And the reason it starts with team is because you can tell when somebody has potential in something you don’t even need to know where something is, but you know somebody’s got the potential. I would bet on your team.

Thanks, Eric. I really appreciate it.

Excellent. Thanks very much.

Sponsored by our friends at Veeam Software! Make sure to click here and get the latest and greatest data protection platform for everything from containers to your cloud!


Sponsored by the Shift Group – Shift Group is turning athletes into sales professionals. Is your company looking to hire driven, competitive former athletes? Shift Group not only offers a large pool of diverse sales candidates from entry level to leadership – they help early stage companies in developing their hiring strategy, interview process and build strong sales cultures that attract the best talent for early stage companies.


Sponsored by the 4-Step Guide to Delivering Extraordinary Software Demos that Win DealsClick here and because we had such good response we have opened it up to make the eBook and Audiobook more accessible by offering it all for only 5$


Sponsored by Diabolical Coffee. Devilishly good coffee and diabolically awesome clothing


Does your startup need strategic technical content? The team at GTM Delta delivers SEO-optimized, compelling content that connects your company with technical users to help grow your credibility, and your pipeline.


Need Podcast gear? We are partnered up with Podcast Gear Pro to share tips, gear ideas and much more. Check it out at PodcastGearPro.com.


Ted Harrington is a best-selling auther of a book called HACKABLE: How to Do Application Security Right, and an Executive Partner at Independent Security Evaluators (ISE).

ISE is a company of ethical hackers most commonly known for our work hacking cars, medical devices, web applications, and password managers and they’ve helped hundreds of companies fix tens of thousands of security vulnerabilities, including Google, Amazon, and Netflix.

We discuss the challenges of security in every day tech, enterprise and personal infosec practices we can all embrace easily, and why it’s so easy to slip on security but equally easy to prevent hacking.

Follow Ted at https://tedharrington.com and check out ISE at https://ise.io 

Sponsored by our friends at Veeam Software! Make sure to click here and get the latest and greatest data protection platform for everything from containers to your cloud!


Sponsored by the Shift Group – Shift Group is turning athletes into sales professionals. Is your company looking to hire driven, competitive former athletes? Shift Group not only offers a large pool of diverse sales candidates from entry level to leadership – they help early stage companies in developing their hiring strategy, interview process and build strong sales cultures that attract the best talent for early stage companies.


Sponsored by the 4-Step Guide to Delivering Extraordinary Software Demos that Win DealsClick here and because we had such good response we have opened it up to make the eBook and Audiobook more accessible by offering it all for only 5$


Sponsored by Diabolical Coffee. Devilishly good coffee and diabolically awesome clothing


Does your startup need strategic technical content? The team at GTM Delta delivers SEO-optimized, compelling content that connects your company with technical users to help grow your credibility, and your pipeline.


Need Podcast gear? We are partnered up with Podcast Gear Pro to share tips, gear ideas and much more. Check it out at PodcastGearPro.com.


Justin grew up reading computer magazines and built PCs for a living in college.

His obsessive curiosity for leveraging technology to advance businesses led him to create the first digital PDF signature tool ‘SignMyPad’ before Adobe and DocuSign came to market. He launched a tech consulting company Virtua Consulting Group which has grown double-digit percentages every year since 2008.

We cover everything from the app economy to building up your side-hustle, the challenges and advantages of bootstrapping, and how you can outsource a lot to get you growing. 

Check out Justin’s book here:  https://amzn.to/3zjocC0  

Visit Virtua Consulting here: https://www.virtuaconsulting.com/ 

Sponsored by our friends at Veeam Software! Make sure to click here and get the latest and greatest data protection platform for everything from containers to your cloud!


Sponsored by the Shift Group – Shift Group is turning athletes into sales professionals. Is your company looking to hire driven, competitive former athletes? Shift Group not only offers a large pool of diverse sales candidates from entry level to leadership – they help early stage companies in developing their hiring strategy, interview process and build strong sales cultures that attract the best talent for early stage companies.


Sponsored by the 4-Step Guide to Delivering Extraordinary Software Demos that Win DealsClick here and because we had such good response we have opened it up to make the eBook and Audiobook more accessible by offering it all for only 5$


Sponsored by Diabolical Coffee. Devilishly good coffee and diabolically awesome clothing


Does your startup need strategic technical content? The team at GTM Delta delivers SEO-optimized, compelling content that connects your company with technical users to help grow your credibility, and your pipeline.


Need Podcast gear? We are partnered up with Podcast Gear Pro to share tips, gear ideas and much more. Check it out at PodcastGearPro.com.


Tony Martignetti is on a mission to elevate leaders and equip them with the tools to navigate through change. He guides leaders who are ready to be elevated by clarifying their focus so they can transform their professional lives and realize their true potential.

He’s the founder of Inspired Purpose Coach and his passion and commitment will be apparent in our conversation. It was a real inspiration and a pleasure to share time with Tony and I hope you enjoy it as much as I did. 

We discuss everything from habit making, finding your purpose, doing good for you and for others, and why the typical self-help books are leading you nowhere.

Follow Tony easily on all his social channels here: https://linktr.ee/inspiredcoach